Thanks for that, but contrary to popular belief you don't get placed on the sex offenders register for absolutely no reason at all.
Vigilante launching paedophile naming website
- Thread starter adriano_8
- Start date
Thanks for that, but contrary to popular belief you don't get placed on the sex offenders register for absolutely no reason at all.
About what?
Name and shame you mean? Maybe there are to many people with things to hide.
Thanks for that, but contrary to popular belief you don't get placed on the sex offenders register for absolutely no reason at all.
No, but there's a hell of a difference between indecent exposure and a convicted child molester and all the stuff in-between.
About what acts can get you on the sex offenders list.
It really is when you consider those are only the Convicted numbers, what about the ones that go completely un-reported, are covered-up or are re-classified/acquitted through technicalities
Scary.No it's not, it contains un-convicted people, again read up on Uk law. Some of the offences that can get you on there are very minor.
I think you're hitting your head against a brick wall Acid, people don't appreciate how the law works and assume because you're on this register then you are a paedophile. This is not true.
Reminiscent of the cow called daisy logic game.
Reminiscent of the cow called daisy logic game.
Which is one of many reason vigilantism sucks so much and this list will do far more damage than good. The sex offenders list is not a bad thing. But there is no need for it to be public. it iis available for people who need t know, such as schools.
Agreed.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 16,024
- Location
- 9th Inner Circle
I would read it again.
"An internet vigilante is publishing an online national database naming and shaming almost 10,0000 paedophiles"
So he is naming sex offenders and paedophiles well done even better.
In the US I can find out who got done for Drugs\DUI\Battery ect with their name and address
and it's run by the USA Gov
Why after serving your time should anybody have the right to know that you had committed and offence? Public safety? Oh no Joe Blogs next door was done for DUI!
That's for actual crimes.
Being able to know where a paedophile lives is like asking for a register where anybody who has suffered mental illness lives in your area.
However because it involves children everybody jumps up and down shouting the same old rhetoric.
Oh no you didn't!
Seriously? I was waiting for somebody to roll that one out. Oh well if it makes us safer then why not make it law for us all to live in glass houses and for us to be GPS monitored. After all we might commit a crime!
Not true either, I'm well aware that the Sex offenders register is not solely Paedophiles.
From the article this guy is supposed to be compiling a list of spefically Paedophiles, not sex offenders.
Paedophiles = Sex offenders
Sex offenders ≠ Paedophiles.
Last edited:
they do not need to know, other than places the child is out of their care. such as nurseries, schools, hospitals. which can all access the list.
The numbers do not add up.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 16,024
- Location
- 9th Inner Circle
Where are my rights (and I am not talking about my rights as a parent) to know that a former burglar lives next door? Or if we are being more accurate...the rights to know that Joe Blogs two doors down once had a stay in a secure hospital for a period of mental illness?
Devils advocate mode on.
So say if you had access to the list, as a parent. How will it help? You find 2 convicted paedophiles within a mile of your address. What are you going to do about it? Move to another area? Maybe a paedophile will move in nearby soon after?
Assault/threaten/kill the pedo? Get locked up for a long stretch for such acts, thus depriving your child of a parent?
Just curious to see why people feel the need to have such a list really, as I cant see the need for this information to be public. (I dont have kids, but my opinion would be the same if I did)
Having lived next to a convicted beast who tried to pray on my young brother (nursery age), I'd have to dissagree with you there.
But no, in your world its just as simple as black and white.
Beasts aren't beasts, and parents don't need to know if there are sexual deviants trying to pass themselves of as genuine members of the public.
The police were just as useless as yourself, funnily enough.
WHAT!
In the US they have Megan's law you can find out about scum in their area.
Also you can find out about anything about anybody there and imho it should be the same here.
It's a major problem, because you aren't supposed to sell a house without informing the sellars of issues like that if you know about them.
Solution, kill the beast (
) or sell the house to someone without a family and doesn't care about sick social deviants living next door and sharing the community.I eventially made him move house. Quite simply.
+1.
They do not have anywhere near the same effect as sexually molesting a minor?
You are really comparing these are you?
OcUK opinion firmly stuck somewhere where I would never want to be.
and you are emotionally involved, which is one of the corner stones of are legal system. Emotionally envolved people have no influence of law, punishment or as part of a jury. You can't be for obvious reasons.
As said, where's everyone rights for any crime. Why are people who are not convicted on the list.
Parents should know where their kids are and not be left with people they don't trust.
yes mistakes and re offences will happen. That can not be helped. That does not mean we need vigilantes though.
Looking at the big picture you have to accept certain risks.
Why should vigilantes go after someone who exposed themselves?
This is not just a list of beasts.
As said, where's everyone rights for any crime. Why are people who are not convicted on the list.
Parents should know where their kids are and not be left with people they don't trust.
yes mistakes and re offences will happen. That can not be helped. That does not mean we need vigilantes though.
Looking at the big picture you have to accept certain risks.
Why should vigilantes go after someone who exposed themselves?
This is not just a list of beasts.
Last edited: