[TW]Fox;17736596 said:If you did always get the money back does that not in itself show how completely stupid the Honda scene is with these cars?
Consider this example.
Honda Civic Type-R EK9. Lets say it has 70k on it and is worth £5k.
You buy it, keep it 2 years, and sell it. You claim you will 'always get your money back'.
Who are the idiots paying the SAME money for a car thats now 2 years older with 20k more miles on it? Why would they do that if they can presumably just buy another one that's a bit newer or has less miles?
Surely it cannot be possible that these cars can gain age and mileage with zero effect on residual?
That would suggest they all have the same used value if nothing reduces this value and you always get your money back.
Its market forces, simples![]()
You sir are a pedant.
Hang on, you've sold nothing yet...
[TW]Fox;17736661 said:He has, he isnt the current owner he's the previous owner. He bought it as a fresh import, kept it for 34 seconds, then sold it on presumably for what he paid and thinks this means no Civic ever loses money ever.
[ui]ICEMAN;17736695 said:Housey, Mark, it just seems we've been doing this all wrong. Sell your Bentley and buy an EK9. I only wish I could have depreciation free motoring in a 911 or Ferrari. I *still* took a loss on my F430 despite the fact that they were in high demand when I sold mine. And well, my 911, I don't even want to think about how much has gone down the pan on that one.
[ui]ICEMAN;17736695 said:Housey, Mark, it just seems we've been doing this all wrong. Sell your Bentley and buy an EK9. I only wish I could have depreciation free motoring in a 911 or Ferrari. I *still* took a loss on my F430 despite the fact that they were in high demand when I sold mine. And well, my 911, I don't even want to think about how much has gone down the pan on that one.