"A vet is not really a reliable source of information" What a load of complete nonsense you've spouted.![]()
An individual is never a reliable source of information because they are fallible and have their own agenda. Peer reviewed publications are the standard of scientific validity.
People forget things, they learn incorrect things and they promote one idea to suit their own agenda. Neutering being a good example, vets promote it as being universally beneficial when if you look at the statistics it often increases the overall mortality rate from many diseases and isn't in the animals best interest. With doctors you get things like circumcision, many doctors in America will promote it despite it being recognised as completely unethical in the civilised world and having negligible benefits.