How Much Do You Pay For Your Broadband?

£12p/m (although technically I pay £6 as the rest of the house share my connection) for a BE Unlimited 24mb package.

I get pretty much a consistent 19mb down/1.4mb up connection :) no complaints here
 
18Mbit sync, 32 public IPs, no shaping, no capping, no usage monitoring.

£0/month

(only) Joy of working for an ISP.

And if it breaks, I have only myself to blame...
 
(only) Joy of working for an ISP.

True :D

Im getting a second line/connection put in early next year from the ISP I work for, however im not sure what way to go, a connection from work or another BE connection, and bond the two lines :D

We dont have proper 21CN services in our area and no FTTP until December 2011 :( so only chances of a 24mb package would be LLU BE.

I dont think work would appreciate my heavy downloading :D
 
Last edited:
£20 for 10MB VM Broadband only. Receive the full 1.1-1.2MB/s and have always had the very top downstream since I've been with NTLWorld from back in 2000.
 
True :D

Im getting a second line/connection put in early next year from the ISP I work for, however im not sure what way to go, a connection from work or another BE connection, and bond the two lines :D

We dont have proper 21CN services in our area and no FTTP until December 2011 :( so only chances of a 24mb package would be LLU BE.

I dont think work would appreciate my heavy downloading :D

I'm vaguely aware I did about 650GB last month (mostly work however, I was working from home a fair bit...)

I've personally been playing with the funky stuff 21CN has given us recently, I've mapped my DSL straight onto a VPLS instance and hence through to a virtual firewall instance in the core which is quite cool, means that all unwelcome traffic gets tossed before it hits the my DSL connection so no wasted bandwidth, it also gives a private (and semi secure) path to my hosted boxes in the datacenter. It should be a nice feature being able to do that for remote offices and homeworkers for business I think. Lastly it means I can simplify my kit at home as I'm firewalling at the remote end, which is nice...
 
i pay £75 ish for Virgin 50Meg bb XL tv and XL phone,

i think £28 a month of that is for the broadband.

can't complain about the speeds



i must stress that this test was done over wireless N so that knocks a little off too
 
Last edited:
im with virgin too, if its there fibreoptic cable you get the speed you pay for. best internet going

For the couple of hours before you exceed the vague quota and get shaped. And if you're not in one of the many areas where they patently don't have enough capacity and everything grinds to a halt in the evening. Some of that is alleviated by going to the top end 50Mbit package true - but it shouldn't be necessary to go that far just to get functional internet (and having spent a few days staying with friends who have 20Mbit VM internet, functional it definitely wasn't).

It's also not fibre optic, it's coax. Go on, cut the cable and have a look, if it's fibre I'll pay for the repairs...
 
What i am trying to say is this: Virgin and all the other companies may be flirting super fast broadband up to 20Mb. But that doesn't mean you will get that. It depends on where you live etc.

You and other people are paying for something you are not getting. Get my drift?
But then some people do :D

Plus getting a upgrade in upload speeds a month earlier then expected though not 5meg as of yet.
 
is it not fiber to the street then coax through your house?

It's essentially FTTC, fibre to the nearest distribution point, but the coax loops are fairly long in some cases. The difference is technology in the copper loop though, not the fibre, DOCSIS is just a different technology to xDSL and isn't rate adaptive (good or bad thing it's difficult to say, in theory you could get higher speeds still if it was).
 
What i am trying to say is this: Virgin and all the other companies may be flirting super fast broadband up to 20Mb. But that doesn't mean you will get that. It depends on where you live etc.

You and other people are paying for something you are not getting. Get my drift?

Hence why they advertise "UP TO" speeds. ;)
 
Are you lot with the cheap ADSL packages factoring in the line rental from BT as well?

Don't forget the time wasted talking to foreign call centres staffed by pigeons!
 
Are you lot with the cheap ADSL packages factoring in the line rental from BT as well?

Don't forget the time wasted talking to foreign call centres staffed by pigeons!

As opposed to the semi mandatory virgin phone rental I don't want either? (and is actually technically unnecessary unlike the BT rental...)
 
Well, I was just pointing out that the cost of a broadband package isn't always the total cost of having said service.

I've managed to switch to an LLU service that has the line rental included so I don't have to pay BT squat any more, and the package is cheaper than the previous BT wholesale one so win win. :D
 
Hence why they advertise "UP TO" speeds. ;)

I really hate this, its always popping up in the media about people complaining of their speeds and blaming ISP's for ripping them off, even though the ISP's clearly state the UP TO part.

It gets me how many people do not read or see this when purchasing a service.
 
IF you want a gauranteed speed you have to pay for it, to get either a leased line or a 1:1 contention ratio. This will cost a few thousand a year. You don't get anything for nothing.
 
IF you want a gauranteed speed you have to pay for it, to get either a leased line or a 1:1 contention ratio. This will cost a few thousand a year. You don't get anything for nothing.

Unless they are in a medium to large business, they are not going to pay for a leased line.

I dont even see smaller businesses opting for a leased lines really but prefer the ADSL failover method from two data centres or line bonding, however again this is not guaranteed speed and uptime, the fail over will give them more redundancy, however if a local BT issue arises, they are screwed.
 
Back
Top Bottom