Well regardless of what you think you know from an IRC channel...
It's just been reported on the news that Anonymous is claiming responsibility for it.
Amazon however are claiming it's a hardware failure.
The number of 'bots' you'd need to take out Amazon is ridiculous. "Anonymous" themselves even said last week they'd need many more users to do it. Plus they said on IRC they're currently attacking MC. So it's unlikely to be them. But, they'll claim credit anyway, as that's what script-kiddies do.Well regardless of what you think you know from an IRC channel...
It's just been reported on the news that Anonymous is claiming responsibility for it.
Amazon however are claiming it's a hardware failure.
Of course they will claim responsibility for it. They're a bunch of amateur computer hacker wannabes. In the 90's we called them "script kiddies". Using other people's software and/or scripts (thinking of that LOIC tool here, which is also just an amateurish tool) for their own gain. Real hackers write their own and tailor them to a very very specific purpose. And second of all, they aren't talking to the press whilst doing it.
just watched on news it is supposed to be hackers but amazon are denying it.
i say it is hackzors and amazon dont want to admit it. or its some master plan to hide someone has mucked up very very large lol
Of course they will claim responsibility for it. They're a bunch of amateur computer hacker wannabes. In the 90's we called them "script kiddies". Using other people's software and/or scripts (thinking of that LOIC tool here, which is also just an amateurish tool) for their own gain. Real hackers write their own and tailor them to a very very specific purpose. And second of all, they aren't talking to the press whilst doing it.
The mistake you're making there is the assumption that HMRC and large corporations aren't on the same side. Fact of the matter is that they haven't payed their fair share of tax, and if they had then we would easily have enough funds not to cut anything this year.
I'm not even going to bother with your other points, they're just words with no basis in fact. There are things that are more important than your shopping you know.
Freedom seems to be a concept you are unfamiliar with, if you can consider a hero such as Assange to be a terrorist. These protesters aren't hindering freedom in any way, they're fighting for it.
Freedom seems to be a concept you are unfamiliar with, if you can consider a hero such as Assange to be a terrorist. These protesters aren't hindering freedom in any way, they're fighting for it.
Assange isn't a hero, he's at best a middleman who takes the credit for the risks and sacrifices others who actually obtain the material for him make.
The same is true of his alleged "secret stash", if the information held therein is so important then is Assange not obliged by his own raison d'etre to release that information regardless of the risk to himself, or is he simply seeking attention and using wikileaks for his own personal aggrandisement and not out of some overriding responsibility or crusade against secrecy.