OMG Amazon down

Well regardless of what you think you know from an IRC channel...

It's just been reported on the news that Anonymous is claiming responsibility for it.
Amazon however are claiming it's a hardware failure.
 
Well regardless of what you think you know from an IRC channel...

It's just been reported on the news that Anonymous is claiming responsibility for it.
Amazon however are claiming it's a hardware failure.

Of course they will claim responsibility for it. They're a bunch of amateur computer hacker wannabes. In the 90's we called them "script kiddies". Using other people's software and/or scripts (thinking of that LOIC tool here, which is also just an amateurish tool) for their own gain. Real hackers write their own and tailor them to a very very specific purpose. And second of all, they aren't talking to the press whilst doing it.
 
just watched on news it is supposed to be hackers but amazon are denying it.

i say it is hackzors and amazon dont want to admit it. or its some master plan to hide someone has mucked up very very large lol
 
Well regardless of what you think you know from an IRC channel...

It's just been reported on the news that Anonymous is claiming responsibility for it.
Amazon however are claiming it's a hardware failure.
The number of 'bots' you'd need to take out Amazon is ridiculous. "Anonymous" themselves even said last week they'd need many more users to do it. Plus they said on IRC they're currently attacking MC. So it's unlikely to be them. But, they'll claim credit anyway, as that's what script-kiddies do.
 
Of course they will claim responsibility for it. They're a bunch of amateur computer hacker wannabes. In the 90's we called them "script kiddies". Using other people's software and/or scripts (thinking of that LOIC tool here, which is also just an amateurish tool) for their own gain. Real hackers write their own and tailor them to a very very specific purpose. And second of all, they aren't talking to the press whilst doing it.

Well the point is, they're anonymous, so you don't know who they are. I'm sure that's the case for the majority of them though.
 
just watched on news it is supposed to be hackers but amazon are denying it.

i say it is hackzors and amazon dont want to admit it. or its some master plan to hide someone has mucked up very very large lol

The outage wasn't consistent with a DDoS. It was more consistent with a hardware failure (which is surprising because Amazon surely never allows itself to have a single point of hardware failure). That, or a more traditional hacking whereby a particular flaw was found and then used to deny service by like say screwing up their router configuration.
 
I'm quite surprised as well, AWS (amazon web service) offers cloud based solutions across a good few sites, the use this for the store as well...

Stelly
 
When i went on amazon it kept adding random items to my cart....

Finally went on last night and ordered Mad Men and Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip.
 
Of course they will claim responsibility for it. They're a bunch of amateur computer hacker wannabes. In the 90's we called them "script kiddies". Using other people's software and/or scripts (thinking of that LOIC tool here, which is also just an amateurish tool) for their own gain. Real hackers write their own and tailor them to a very very specific purpose. And second of all, they aren't talking to the press whilst doing it.

Thing is, they don't pretend to be anything more. In fact, there was talk last night of the attack on Amazon being carried out by a black hat.

Enough people with hammers working away can turn a pile of scrap metal into a boat, or vice versa.

There's nothing wrong with using LOIC, no, they haven't spent 15 straight years of their life coding and learning the tricks of the trade. Doesn't mean their cause is any less relevant.
 
The mistake you're making there is the assumption that HMRC and large corporations aren't on the same side. Fact of the matter is that they haven't payed their fair share of tax, and if they had then we would easily have enough funds not to cut anything this year.

I'm not even going to bother with your other points, they're just words with no basis in fact. There are things that are more important than your shopping you know.

There are things more important than your opinion as well, freedom being one of them. Small groups trying to deprive larger groups of their freedom through obstructive or violent protest needs to be controlled to protect the freedom of the majority.
 
Freedom seems to be a concept you are unfamiliar with, if you can consider a hero such as Assange to be a terrorist. These protesters aren't hindering freedom in any way, they're fighting for it.
 
Freedom seems to be a concept you are unfamiliar with, if you can consider a hero such as Assange to be a terrorist. These protesters aren't hindering freedom in any way, they're fighting for it.

Attacking the freedom of everyone to go about their lives is not the actions of freedom fighters, but children and idiots.

Assange started with a good point, now he's just being a bit of a plank...
 
Freedom seems to be a concept you are unfamiliar with, if you can consider a hero such as Assange to be a terrorist. These protesters aren't hindering freedom in any way, they're fighting for it.

Assange isn't a hero, he's at best a middleman who takes the credit for the risks and sacrifices others who actually obtain the material for him make.

Wikileaks and Assange himself have become a parody of what a whistle-blower really is. He is using information that has no need or reason to be in the public domain to further his own egomania and infamy.

He should have stuck to releasing exposé's on relevant topics and not the political babble of diplomats et al, he simply denigrates his own ideology and credibility by continuing to do so.

The same is true of his alleged "secret stash", if the information held therein is so important then is Assange not obliged by his own raison d'etre to release that information regardless of the risk to himself, or is he simply seeking attention and using wikileaks for his own personal aggrandisement and not out of some overriding responsibility or crusade against secrecy.
 
Assange isn't a hero, he's at best a middleman who takes the credit for the risks and sacrifices others who actually obtain the material for him make.

Sounds like his own words


The same is true of his alleged "secret stash", if the information held therein is so important then is Assange not obliged by his own raison d'etre to release that information regardless of the risk to himself, or is he simply seeking attention and using wikileaks for his own personal aggrandisement and not out of some overriding responsibility or crusade against secrecy.

I'd no doubt do the same in his position. Why not keep files back as insurance for his safety?
 
Back
Top Bottom