[TW]Fox;17993785 said:Absolutely - thats the benefit of not having to reword a Wikipedia article to make a point, unlike some![]()
perfect illustration on Fox's inability to drop anything

[TW]Fox;17993785 said:Absolutely - thats the benefit of not having to reword a Wikipedia article to make a point, unlike some![]()
how much of that is down to the fact that Fox is an obstinate argumentative type of guy ?
He can often post 10/15 times in the space of 5 / 10 minutes when in the middle of a Robbie G / Mike Hiow thread.
eg.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/misc.php?do=whoposted&t=18202992
146 posts in the last big MikeHiow thread.
[TW]Fox;17993836 said:Sometimes you need to be persistent if the worry is that the other person is trying to sweep it under the carpet![]()
I can easily spend over 12 hours a day on here when i'm at work. I'll be monitoring the servers, monitoring the e-mails etc.. and have overclockers on another screen for the quiet time.
christ how much do you get paid again?... I need a new job
I think the real test here is to click View page info in Firefox..
Have I visited this site before today? Yes, 30,705 times![]()
Talk about a hit and run though, cheets would be proud.
I cant believe it... you've put my little secret out
Final was worth a watch though... its all the other **** before it.