i fail to see how the police can justify this as reasonable force!
In my line of work in which I carry power of a constable there is no way in hell you would get away with doing what the met police thugs are doing here, even if he was refusing a direct order its still not reasonable in the circumstances!
i fail to see how the police can justify this as reasonable force!
In my line of work in which I carry power of a constable there is no way in hell you would get away with doing what the met police thugs are doing here, even if he was refusing a direct order its still not reasonable in the circumstances!
Why not, no-one was hurt. The only thing that was hurt Jody McIntyre's pride nothing more. Would you rather they used water cannon as was suggested by some supporters of the protests
There is a big difference to teaching UDT in a classroom and applying it practically.
they didnt need to use that much force though it was clearly unreasonable, as someone who teaches home office approved control and restraint techniques their is nothing reasonable about dragging someone and turfing them out of a wheelchair, it is clearly illegal use of force. If he was in danger they could have just picked him up or wheeled him out the way.
yet again the police show their true colours and demonstrate how unprofessional they really are!
As someone who teaches approved control and restraint techniques you should know that dragging someone who did not want to be moved (remember they were not willing participants here regardless of his disability) away from an security zone is in fact an approved technique.
The fact remeains that he was not injured in any way (he admitted this himself), so undue force was not used by that very fact alone.
Seen this last night was shocked so I made a complaint.
Never sent a complaint in before but this was atrocious.
As someone who teaches approved control and restraint techniques you should know that dragging someone who did not want to be moved (remember they were not willing participants here regardless of his disability) away from an security zone is in fact an approved technique.
The footage is not clear enough to draw the kind of conclusions you have as to the options available to the Police at the time.
The fact remains that he was not injured in any way (he admitted this himself), so undue force was not used by that very fact alone.
I cannot go into specifics as it is a restricted document, but there should have been someone to lift and carry his legs and someone to protect the head. even if he was not injured force still has to be reasonable
I suppose that guy who got smashed in the head with a baton, the right wing ocuk would also think that was reasonable!
Castiel don't you give up, you have been some what spamming this thread.
Give other people a chance. I think we get the gist of what you and your far right posters friends think.
Castiel don't you give up, you have been some what spamming this thread.
Give other people a chance. I think we get the gist of what you and your far right posters friends think.
I am not right wing to begin with. And I suggest you look up what spamming is before you accuse me of it.![]()