Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Try emailing dell. Will you actually nitice a difference though? Even if ut could only use 500,000,000 colours it would most likely be good enough. Ask yourself if it is worth the extra money upgrading monitor/gpu.
To answer your question Cythx, you need displayport to get the 10bit colour processing.
but the monitor doesn't support native resolution with HDMIHDMI 1.3 onwards does support it indeed![]()
but the monitor doesn't support native resolution with HDMI![]()
you'll need a professional video card as far as i can remember. i've had 5870 hooked up using displayport, and it won't display 10 bit colours, at least i couldn't find option to do it.
shame that dual-link DVI does not support 10 bit colour.
I'll just drop this link here:
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1035522135
And yes, Radeon 5800s fully support Deep Color feature. Even 4800s do for that matter. It was Nvidia that held it exclusive to their professional Quadro series up until recently.
Thank youI thought this would be the case.
Is there any perceivable difference between 16.7 mil and 1.07 bil colours for most people? I don't want to be missing out on much if I can just get a 6970 instead.