What is the attraction with augmented reality? The only usefulness of it I can see is GPS navigation anything else is just for fun.
120gb+ isn't too far off, but I'm not so sure about 1 week+ on a single charge, unless you choose to have a bigger phone overall...Agreed, if there is one thing I want to see developed it's battery life and memory capacity, one or two days per charge is rubbish, I'd like to see a week per charge and 120gb+
Agreed, if there is one thing I want to see developed it's battery life and memory capacity, one or two days per charge is rubbish, I'd like to see a week per charge and 120gb+
Probably pittance to actually manufacture, but then you have to take into account all the company's other operating costs which need to be covered from this - design, engineering, software development, marketing, sales, admin, customer support, logistics, real estate etc.
I really don't see the fascination with seethrough screens. 1, it means you can see through them, way to make the reading difficult, and 2, others can see what you're looking at.
If super-capacitors ever take off, that would be rather good, no more waiting hours for your phone to charge, your phone could be charged in a few seconds!![]()
![]()
Parts for the Nexus 1 cost about $180, similar to the iPhone 4 ($174)
The technology already exists:Now that I can imagine. Being 35 odd and saying "remember the days when you actually had to wait for stuff to charge" is very akin to "remember when you had to dial to connect to the internet and your parents couldn't use the phone at the same time" or "remember when hard drivers were over £1 per GB". It'll come, surely!
In 2007, a cordless electric screwdriver that uses an EDLC for energy storage was produced.[39] It charges in 90 seconds, retains 85% of the charge after 3 months, and holds enough charge for about half the screws (22) a comparable screwdriver with a rechargeable battery will handle (37). Two LED flashlights using EDLCs were released in 2009. They charge in 90 seconds.[40]
I had the 6210, that picture isn't it. That's a 3210.
[TW]Fox;18053919 said:I think he is thinking of the 3210, not the 6210. The 6210 was the high end business handset, the 3210 was the very popular consumer phone with changeagle covers.
That was the phone! Found it ridiculously hard to find a timeline of popular phones and my 10 year memory isn't so good. Updated OP.