lol AMD's powers efficiency is up there with Nvidia's now, considering it's a smaller core that's kind of poor.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
amd are in trouble.
They lost the W-lead.
They lost the single GPU crown with 480gtx.
They lost the quiet GPU solution.
And they "might" even lose the dual gpu battle.
It all looked so good in SEP 2009.![]()
lol AMD's powers efficiency is up there with Nvidia's now, considering it's a smaller core that's kind of poor.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
I am very happy with the performance and delighted I made the purchase.
*Edit* Guru3d reckons the 6970 draws 207 watt, something don't seem right there.
Due to the fact that we scrapped all FurMark results we are re-measuring all temp/dba/power tests with the new stress software. Again the Wattage displayed are the cards with the GPU(s) stressed 100%, showing only the GPU power draw, not the entire PC.
You can test memory power usage can you? same goes for Nvidia and thier memory then, how many watts does 2GB DDR5 uses over 1.5GB DDR5, I bet it's a few watts at best. Unless you got some conclusive proof how many watts both camps memory use then it's just speculation. Let's take in to account that Nvidia use a 384 bit memory interface, I bet that adds some watts over the AMD 256 bit.
The 6970 isn't competing with the 580, which by the way has a higher power consumption according to your own charts... Its slightly faster than a 570, which it uses less power to.
From what I can gather from this PDF each 2Gb (256MB) Gddr5 module will consume around 12 watt, maybe a touch more at their 6970 speeds, which at around their rated 1.5V seems about right.
*Edited* .
But PowerTune does step in to curb the power-draw when running an 'out-of-spec' application such as FurMark. The Radeon numbers look impressive, but the GPU isn't running at peak speeds all the time. Take a look at this text file and you will see that the Radeon HD 6970 flicks between a 598.5MHz core and the default 880MHz core speed.
what have you clocked your 5850 too?
my 5870 @ 900/1300 result below
10.12 drivers
![]()
Is that a "dry run" i.e. did you let the benchmark loop before running it? My 5850 is only at 850/1100. With your i7 and more RAM I presume, I'm very surprised tbh
Kitch9 said:The 6970 isn't competing with the 580, which by the way has a higher power consumption according to your own charts... Its slightly faster than a 570, which it uses less power to.
http://www.samsung.com/global/busine...reen_gddr5.pdf
From what I can gather from this PDF each 2Gb (256MB) Gddr5 module will consume around 12 watt, maybe a touch more at their 6970 speeds, which at around their rated 1.5V seems about right.
*Edited* .
amd are in trouble.
They lost the W-lead.
They lost the single GPU crown with 480gtx.
They lost the quiet GPU solution.
And they "might" even lose the dual gpu battle.
It all looked so good in SEP 2009.![]()
I like the company that gives me the most performance for least £.
And it aint AMD at the minute thats for sure.![]()