Also, the 335 may only be 30bhp down, but its also nearly a second slower to 60!
I'm not going to get into a 335i v TT-RS debate as Gibbo isnt considernig a 335i and neither do I think it's the same type of car as a TT-RS but the two important points here are that the official figures for the 335i are ridiculously conservative - Car and Driver timed it at just 4.9 to 60 - and of course the TT-RS has the benefit of Quattro for getting off the mark quickly.
34 more than a 335i. Not quite sure what that's got to do with anything though![]()
I'm just trying to highlight why I think the TT-RS is the odd one out. It's not hugely more powerful than the top non M power BMW 3 Series. It is, in this company, up against the legend that is the Porsche 911 and the sheer brute force of the Corvette Z06. It's trying to satisfy a guy who thinks a Nissan GT-R is a bit boring. It's going to take a serious precision instrument or something really lairy to win Gibbo over. And Audi TT is none of this.
It is out of its depth, which is what I was attempting to highlight with the 335i comparison.
Everyone would quite rightly laugh if it was suggested that he should consider a 335i. The TT-RS isnt a world away.