Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 8,537
might be a bit long/boring but here's what happened;
at the beginning of the month i ordered a blu ray from a popular website as part of a Christmas present from a relative to me (they told me to buy something I wanted so they could wrap it up, bit silly I know but least this way I get something I can use), they update my account on the 5th of December with an eta of 3-5 working days. with the 10th being the latest date.
by the 10th this package had not been received and I queried with them on the 18th (I'm more than aware that snow and Christmas made deliveries this month a bit sketchy and hence let it sit for a few extra days), said company reminded me, like i am some ignorant fool, that royal mail were having severe delays due to weather conditions and that they felt confident that I would take delivery of the parcel by the 20th of December, this came and went, on the 21st I notified them of this but they did not reply until the 24th, thereby meaning I was never going to get the parcel or a refund before Christmas.
they offered me a replacement or a refund, I took the refund, now guess what, 25 days after posting I receive the blu ray (long after items I ordered before and since had arrived).
now, I'm an honest person but I'm inclined to keep it and the refund because as far as I'm concerned they entered in to a contract with me, I pay them money for a receipt of goods (and in turn royal mail enter in to a contract with them for money in exchange for couriering these goods with a maximum suggested time of 2 weeks (which I waited)). as far as I'm concerned both I and the retailer held up our sides of the contract, royal mail failed to and therefore the retailer should seek recompense from them and I should be compensated for wasted time.
is this the right way to view this situation? is the morally acceptable?
at the beginning of the month i ordered a blu ray from a popular website as part of a Christmas present from a relative to me (they told me to buy something I wanted so they could wrap it up, bit silly I know but least this way I get something I can use), they update my account on the 5th of December with an eta of 3-5 working days. with the 10th being the latest date.
by the 10th this package had not been received and I queried with them on the 18th (I'm more than aware that snow and Christmas made deliveries this month a bit sketchy and hence let it sit for a few extra days), said company reminded me, like i am some ignorant fool, that royal mail were having severe delays due to weather conditions and that they felt confident that I would take delivery of the parcel by the 20th of December, this came and went, on the 21st I notified them of this but they did not reply until the 24th, thereby meaning I was never going to get the parcel or a refund before Christmas.
they offered me a replacement or a refund, I took the refund, now guess what, 25 days after posting I receive the blu ray (long after items I ordered before and since had arrived).
now, I'm an honest person but I'm inclined to keep it and the refund because as far as I'm concerned they entered in to a contract with me, I pay them money for a receipt of goods (and in turn royal mail enter in to a contract with them for money in exchange for couriering these goods with a maximum suggested time of 2 weeks (which I waited)). as far as I'm concerned both I and the retailer held up our sides of the contract, royal mail failed to and therefore the retailer should seek recompense from them and I should be compensated for wasted time.
is this the right way to view this situation? is the morally acceptable?