Caporegime
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 34,576
- Location
- Warwickshire
And you drive a 1.4 Golf. Jog on.
Yeah, engine of the year iirc? Wish I'd gone for that tatty old Bimmer instead, just so I could say I owned one

And you drive a 1.4 Golf. Jog on.
Yeah, engine of the year iirc? Wish I'd gone for that tatty old Bimmer instead, just so I could say I owned one.
Yeah, engine of the year iirc? Wish I'd gone for that tatty old Bimmer instead, just so I could say I owned one.
[TW]Fox;18151018 said:Yea, in the 1-litre to 1.4-litre category. What a category!
Amusingly, 4 of the next 5 categories in the Engine of the Year contest have been won this time by.... your favourite brand. BMW.
My car is interesting! It's a 40mpg petrol that develops 160PS with only 1400ccs.
Janesy B's 1.4 is outgunned by my bicycle to put it in perspective.
My car is interesting! It's a 40mpg petrol that develops 160PS with only 1400ccs.
Janesy B's 1.4 is outgunned by my bicycle to put it in perspective.
My car is interesting! It's a 40mpg petrol that develops 160PS with only 1400ccs.
Janesy B's 1.4 is outgunned by my bicycle to put it in perspective.
That's only interesting if you are called Geoffrey, drink stout and own a beard.
No, it's a generic hatch with a 1.4L engine, it's not a brilliant motorway cruiser like a 5 series, or a backlane chuckable toy like a Clio 192 or whatever the latest one is.
I don't think his cost about £17,000 though![]()
The 1.4 TSI is a technical delight for beardy boffins
The rest of us would far rather have a car with the BMW 4.0 V8 or the AMG 6.2 V8 that also featured in this years awards.
My mate has the 1.4 TSI in his New Fabia VRS, despite the fact its not that fast, he still thinks it a veritable rocket ship ?![]()
Ok so I'm a boring old fart! But my Golf does a job.
Even with petrol at 130ppl all you capacity whores are still calling my frugal hatchback crap. I think it gives me the best of both worlds...fast enough, efficient enough, comfy enough, loads of grip, fine the steering is dead...but 90% of my time is spent at 50mph plodding, to work or going to Tesco.
Given that neither of us either commute on motorways or are 17 year old boys, what should I have bought?!
Fact is Howard rips into my 1.4, when he has a massive 200ccs more capacity than me and one less turbocharger. Not only that, he has
A MAZDA
So nerr.
I think I'll do a 10k mile review actually and bump my original thread, should be fun.
Fact is Howard rips into my 1.4, when he has a massive 200ccs more capacity than me and one less turbocharger. Not only that, he has
A MAZDA
So nerr.
Point is though, your dig at what Howard drives (mostly a Ford actually) was completely pointless (especially as an MX-5 is seen to be one of the best cheap little roadsters available)
So as far as i can see, he's right ?
Don't think Ford had much to do with the early MX-5's which is a good thing imo, Mazdas were made to be bullet proof back then, which isn't quite the case now. And any MX-5 > Golf all day long.
What?
Howard owns an MX-5 that is supercharged, this is his fun car. He also owns a Mondeo ST220, this is his every day car. Not sure how you worked that out to be Ford working on the 90's MX-5.![]()