depends if there is a need for water cooling. water cooling will give better results but is a costly expence if you are not going to overclock your cpu to the max
If it's something that looks cool - watercooling
Temperature - watercooling is slightly cooler than air
Noise - watercooling will beat top end air for noise
Price - air cooling
Ease of use - air cooling
Overclocking - easily done on air imo
I think the price because it is one of the cheapest watercooling units available. the temp of the cpu because i will be using my computer for a number of different applications like, gaming, photshop and using it for college work. the noise is important because i don't want to have a loud system.
nah not weeks to months, if reading the right stuff. Think i was comfortable to go ahead after about 2 weeks worth of research, heck took me longer to get all the gear together lol.
I think the weeks to months is a bit far, though I suppose it depends how long it takes you to wrap your head around details of it (e.g. temperature delta)
TheCenturion sums up watercooling perfectly, so wont add anything there.
Personally I think the biggest gain in watercooling is the lower temps and reduced noise (especially gpu fan noise.) If you are not going to an overclock and its just going to be cpu then I would say stick to air and just get a decent heat sink then noise shouldn't be too much trouble either.
A few weeks to learn the basics seems reasonable, though it's perfectly possible to knock up a loop after a few hours. Pump with built in reservoir, block, radiator connected however you wish.
However i'm still learning after a year or so how to do it better.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.