I actually researched this a little bit more for you mr Spoon.
The wikipedia statistics surely paint a bleak picture of Sweden as the rape capital of Europe, but there are some very important caveats, as statistics have a nature of being manipulated towards one persons ends.
So, Sweden does not have the same definition of rape that the rest of the EU does. Something like kissing a woman when she does not want to be kissed could be counted as rape. In the rest of the EU, rape is a violent act. In Sweden, consentual sex with no violence can technically be reported as rape in many circumstances too.
The fact that these very elaborate over reaching types of behaviour are included under the header of rape is what is making the statistics skewed in this manner. Not that Sweden is without rape, I'm not saying that, just that the title of rape is given to so many things, that it is bound to have a largening effect on the statistics. What the actual statistics are when comparing like for like crimes, I could not say, but to say that Sweden is the rape capital of Europe is most certainly false.
If the government did change the constitution to allow people of non-swedish origin to hold sensitive or high positions within the Swedish government, then it is not really common knowledge. Hardly anyone I talked to (many of whom were learned men with beards and pipes and such) had heard about it, and the one person who had thought it was in reference to the Sami people (basically the Native Indians of America, or Aborigionals of Australia, but in Sweden) finally getting recognition for being able to hold office. Long overdue really, and not something the populace need to be consulted on IMHO.