Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 5,207
Hi all.
Currently not very happy with my Q6600 for video editing in Sony Vegas, and problems with my motherboard have prevented me from using my 8800 GTX and my new ATI 6870. So figuring that I would have to buy a new motherboard, which again is old technology, I felt it was time to move onto something new.
At present, I am going back and fourth on the idea of going with the older SKT 1366 i7's, as they have some good motherboard deals and enough ram slots to keep adding more ram in the future. The other thing is, Sandy Bridge is here, and it looks damn impressive, and it's quite affordable, but the i7 sandy bridge is out of my price range and so I have been looking at the SB i5 range instead. What I am mostly keen on though (reason for looking at the old i7's) is having 8 cores (well the 4 threaded hyperthreading cores in addition) with the i7's, as this will really help me with the work I am doing at the moment with video editing, and future photoshop processing I will be doing. But, given the speed of the sandy bridge i5's, would I be better off just going with one of them than the older i7's?
Another thing, I realise now that my ATI 6870 card is not going to be helpful with my Adobe programs, as they seem to be more optimised for Nvidia's CUDA, which I see is very beneficial. So now I can't decide whether to keep my ATI 6870 or flog it and get an Nvidia card instead, possibly something cheaper - to add more money to the rest of my system. The problem I also have with possibly changing gfx cards again, is that it has made me feel anxious about the performance I will get in the games I play now (COD:BO, L4D2, BC2, GTAIV, Metro2033 and Crysis) with something cheaper from Nvidia. Ideally I would want the most comparable performance to my ATI 6870 or maybe faster for the same or slightly less money, but too many varying prices and benchmark performances has made me so confused, as to which card from Nvidia would be up for the job.
Lastly, is it better to go with a motherboard that has SLI/Crossfire configurations for futureproofing or should I save the cash and not bother it? Furthermore, if I do bother what sort of power supply would meet my needs in this regard for the future?
Sorry that is an awful lot to read, but I intend for this upgrade to last me 4-5 years like my Core 2 system did.
Budget is £400 (mobo, cpu and ram) but if I sell my ATI 6870 that will allow for a little more room, but will still need a gfx card!
Thanks in advance.
Currently not very happy with my Q6600 for video editing in Sony Vegas, and problems with my motherboard have prevented me from using my 8800 GTX and my new ATI 6870. So figuring that I would have to buy a new motherboard, which again is old technology, I felt it was time to move onto something new.
At present, I am going back and fourth on the idea of going with the older SKT 1366 i7's, as they have some good motherboard deals and enough ram slots to keep adding more ram in the future. The other thing is, Sandy Bridge is here, and it looks damn impressive, and it's quite affordable, but the i7 sandy bridge is out of my price range and so I have been looking at the SB i5 range instead. What I am mostly keen on though (reason for looking at the old i7's) is having 8 cores (well the 4 threaded hyperthreading cores in addition) with the i7's, as this will really help me with the work I am doing at the moment with video editing, and future photoshop processing I will be doing. But, given the speed of the sandy bridge i5's, would I be better off just going with one of them than the older i7's?
Another thing, I realise now that my ATI 6870 card is not going to be helpful with my Adobe programs, as they seem to be more optimised for Nvidia's CUDA, which I see is very beneficial. So now I can't decide whether to keep my ATI 6870 or flog it and get an Nvidia card instead, possibly something cheaper - to add more money to the rest of my system. The problem I also have with possibly changing gfx cards again, is that it has made me feel anxious about the performance I will get in the games I play now (COD:BO, L4D2, BC2, GTAIV, Metro2033 and Crysis) with something cheaper from Nvidia. Ideally I would want the most comparable performance to my ATI 6870 or maybe faster for the same or slightly less money, but too many varying prices and benchmark performances has made me so confused, as to which card from Nvidia would be up for the job.
Lastly, is it better to go with a motherboard that has SLI/Crossfire configurations for futureproofing or should I save the cash and not bother it? Furthermore, if I do bother what sort of power supply would meet my needs in this regard for the future?
Sorry that is an awful lot to read, but I intend for this upgrade to last me 4-5 years like my Core 2 system did.
Budget is £400 (mobo, cpu and ram) but if I sell my ATI 6870 that will allow for a little more room, but will still need a gfx card!
Thanks in advance.
Last edited:

