Caporegime
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 28,768
- Location
- Auckland
I've only quickly skimmed it so sorry if this is brief; I'll do more tomorrow if you want.
The CV is almost a one pager which, unless you are far more amazing than your CV lets on, is a big no-no. It's terribly compact! Use the two pages to really expand on the things you believe sell yourself to whichever company you're applying to.
Also, 'tasks' is when one is being ordered to do something. Did you ever have any responsibility in any of your mentioned jobs? Regardless, 'tasks' is dreadful.
Dump the 'British', as well. DOB is not necessary but many recruiters will be interested so keep it.
The list style/bullet points is not doing what you think it's doing. It's very impersonal and tells me next to nothing about what you did at either University or in your jobs. Well, it does but it doesn't tell me anything about you, it tells me what the course entailed and what those jobs entailed. A CV should be your achievements but also your personality, in print.
I think you have a factually accurate CV. Not enough, man, not enough. If I'm reading that, I want to know about you probably more than I want to know what you've done or where you were schooled. Many CVs come to a pass/fail gate based on an expected level of education and experience; it becomes a go/don't go response to whether you stay on the desk or go in the bin. What can get you the job is you, how you deal with matters, how you gel with people, how you approach problems, how you handle defeat and view challenges etc. Of course, some or even most of this will come at interview stage but injecting personality into your CV is tremendously important.
tl;dr - a factual CV is good. A factually accurate CV which also conveys the writer's personality is far, far better.
e : wait, are you the guy who was banging on about being far better positioned to hand out financial advice as an Accountant (even though you're not one and even if you were, you're still not in a position to do so as you were told by actual Accountants) in the Shep thread?
The CV is almost a one pager which, unless you are far more amazing than your CV lets on, is a big no-no. It's terribly compact! Use the two pages to really expand on the things you believe sell yourself to whichever company you're applying to.
Also, 'tasks' is when one is being ordered to do something. Did you ever have any responsibility in any of your mentioned jobs? Regardless, 'tasks' is dreadful.
Dump the 'British', as well. DOB is not necessary but many recruiters will be interested so keep it.
The list style/bullet points is not doing what you think it's doing. It's very impersonal and tells me next to nothing about what you did at either University or in your jobs. Well, it does but it doesn't tell me anything about you, it tells me what the course entailed and what those jobs entailed. A CV should be your achievements but also your personality, in print.
I think you have a factually accurate CV. Not enough, man, not enough. If I'm reading that, I want to know about you probably more than I want to know what you've done or where you were schooled. Many CVs come to a pass/fail gate based on an expected level of education and experience; it becomes a go/don't go response to whether you stay on the desk or go in the bin. What can get you the job is you, how you deal with matters, how you gel with people, how you approach problems, how you handle defeat and view challenges etc. Of course, some or even most of this will come at interview stage but injecting personality into your CV is tremendously important.
tl;dr - a factual CV is good. A factually accurate CV which also conveys the writer's personality is far, far better.
e : wait, are you the guy who was banging on about being far better positioned to hand out financial advice as an Accountant (even though you're not one and even if you were, you're still not in a position to do so as you were told by actual Accountants) in the Shep thread?
Last edited: