How do franchises work?

Mig

Mig

Associate
Joined
3 Jan 2011
Posts
128
I just bought a Subway for lunch (yessir), and was wondering what the benefit is, from a business perspective, to make all the stores franchise owned and operated?

Wouldn't Subway make more money and have more control by running all its stores itself?
 
Less over heads, less cost, less infrastructure needed, risk minimalisation, easiest way to expand relatively quickly - basically just profit from licenses and goods
 
dunno, i'd always thought it made it easier to administer.

McDonalds and Burger King are both franchises as well iirc ??

When you get to that size, where you've got millions of stores world wide, its got to be easier just to sell them their stock, and take a cut of their profits, than try and administer that many stores and that many staff.
 
I thought McDonalds wasn't a franchise, whereas Burger King, KFC and pretty much every other fast food outlet was.

And to the OP, which would you rather:

Earn 100% of the cash and have to do 100% of the work
Earn 50% of the cash and have to do 10% of the work
 
In a lot of business "licensing" is where it's at.
I mean as a company we license much of our IP - and it's money for old rope.
You've already done all of the work - it's the product that just keeps on giving.

Franchise is the same - all the hard work already done by getting your name out there.
Let somebody else have the hassle of managing store and staff and you simply take a cut of the profits for letting them use your brand - profit!
 
I thought McDonalds wasn't a franchise, whereas Burger King, KFC and pretty much every other fast food outlet was.
There's some BK owned Burger Kings and there are some franchise Mcdonalds. Mcdonalds force a lot more management onto their franchises though, and I think the majority of stand-alone shops are mcdonalds owned and the majority of BK's are franchises. All food-court type outlets are usually franchises.
 
I thought McDonalds wasn't a franchise,

i worked for one part time while i was at college

they definately are.

There are 3 mcdonalds in wakefield, all owned by the same bloke. He employs a store manager and a deputy store manager to run the stores, they hire & fire etc. Stock is all bought direct from Mcdonalds and they decide the pricing, quality, provide the cooking equipment etc..

If you look in the kitchen of a mcdonalds its the same at every one in the country.

So as a franchise owner, you buy your land, you build your store, you buy everything from mcdonalds / their approved supplier as appropriate and then hire somebody to run the store for you.

Get the location right and you just have to sit back and let the money come in.
 
There's some BK owned Burger Kings and there are some franchise Mcdonalds. Mcdonalds force a lot more management onto their franchises though, and I think the majority of stand-alone shops are mcdonalds owned and the majority of BK's are franchises. All food-court type outlets are usually franchises.

all of the mcdonalds in the UK are franchised i believe.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...r-franchise-in-the-UK-as-downturn-bucked.html

The chain's current strategy is to encourage successful franchise holders to run more restaurants. Since 2005, the average number owned by each franchisee has increased from 2.25 to 3.5 restaurants.
Mr Rogers said one of the reasons for encouraging the best of its 170 franchise owners to expand was to ensure that they had the cashflow to justify the necessary investment that McDonald's knew was needed if its restaurants were to remain attractive.

170 franchise owners with an average of 3.5 restaurants each.

Thats got to be pretty much all of them in the UK.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom