Stupid Cyclist

I think the van driver knew he was in the wrong, hence the aggression!

The only time cyclists annoy me is outside my flat...there is a dedicated cycle lane on the pavement which the cyclists seem to avoid at all costs and instead cycle on the pavement and try to cycle as close to the pedestrians as they possible can!!
 
So many angelic motorists around. Amazing. Here's a few hazard perception questions based on a few incidents yesterday i observed:

Hazard perception 1: Motorists approaches parked cars with a cyclist. Is the cyclist?

a) Going to cycle over the roof of the parked car
b) Dig a tunnel and go under the car
c) move out to overtake and that he’ll leave a good distance between him and the car in case a car door opens.
d) Pick up the parked car and move it out of the way

Hazard perception 2: Taking you answered hazard perception 1 correctly, does the motorist:
a) Sound his horn scaring the cyclist off his bike,
b) Give the cyclist time and room to make this manoeuvre safely
c) Race to overtake the parked car first.
d) Pretend he isn’t there and just knock him off anyway

Hazard perception 3: You have are using a mobile whilst driving. Should you:
a) Text, it’s far safer than phoning because no one can see the headset?
b) Use your teeth to steer the vehicle.
c) Buy the latest Android phone
d) You shouldn’t be using your phone, not only is it illegal but it s dangerous and darn right stupid

Hard perception 4: Motorist at right hand filter lane crossing a dual carriageway. The filter light is green but the exit is not free. Do you..
a) Just get through that green light regardless if you then block carriage way.
b) Only proceed if exist is clear
c) Fit a bull bar so you can ram through.
d) Close your eyes and hope that big bloke in the white van stays seated.
 
Last edited:
So many angelic motorists around. Amazing. Here's a few hazard perception questions based on a few incidents yesterday i observed:

Hazard perception 1: Motorists approaches parked cars with a cyclist. Is the cyclist?

a) Going to cycle over the roof of the parked car
b) Dig a tunnel and go under the car
c) move out to overtake and that he’ll leave a good distance between him and the car in case a car door opens.
d) Pick up the parked car and move it out of the way

Hazard perception 2: Taking you answered hazard perception 1 correctly, does the motorist:
a) Sound his horn scaring the cyclist off his bike,
b) Give the cyclist time and room make his manoeuvre safely
c) Race to overtake the parked car first.
d) Pretend he isn’t there and just knock him off anyway

Hazard perception 3: You have are using a mobile whilst driving. Should you:
a) Text, it’s far safer than phoning because no one can see the headset?
b) Use your teeth to steer the vehicle.
c) Buy the latest Android phone
d) You shouldn’t be using your phone, not only is it illegal but it s dangerous and darn right stupid

Hard perception 4: Motorist at right hand filter lane crossing a dual carriageway. The filter light is green but the exit is not free. Do you..
a) Just get through that green light regardless if you then block carriage way.
b) Only proceed if exist is clear
c) Fit a bull bar so you can ram through.
d) Close your eyes and hope that big bloke in the white van stays seated.

I'm sure there is a joke in there somewhere :(
 
1 and 2 give a pretty good indication of what drivers do all the time. If I see parked cars up ahead I'll tend to move out a good 30 or so metres before I get there. I know if I leave it any later there is a good chance that any cars following won't let me out.
 
[DOD]Asprilla;18380763 said:
1 and 2 give a pretty good indication of what drivers do all the time. If I see parked cars up ahead I'll tend to move out a good 30 or so metres before I get there. I know if I leave it any later there is a good chance that any cars following won't let me out.

You'd be suprised... a lot of motorist don't do this. They normally head up right to the parked car before making a manoeuvre. It's like the are only driving to what is only inches in front of them with no perception of what's ahead. If many of these drivers where motorcyclists, they'd be dead.
 
You'd be suprised... a lot of motorist don't do this. They normally head up right to the parked car before making a manoeuvre. It's like the are only driving to what is only inches in front of them with no perception of what's ahead. If many of these drivers where motorcyclists, they'd be dead.

No, I meant when I'm on my bike I move out into the middle of the lane as early before the parked cars as I can.
 
[DOD]Asprilla;18380814 said:
No, I meant when I'm on my bike I move out into the middle of the lane as early before the parked cars as I can.

Oh I see, yes I do too. This is when I'm most likely to get beeped at or in one particular case, A coke can chucked at me.
 
Was riding cycle's for 2 years through my city centre & i can tell you i was always aware of situations seen in that BBC clip. When approaching lane's without only enough space for both a bike & car , i would slow down to let the person behind me through or if they were too far back i would speed up. Only time i ever got p*ssed off was when a BMW driver moved his car foward a few feet untill it nudged my back wheel...this was at the lights with me a the front.

I told someone at work who simply said he'd get off his bike, stand in front of the car, get his keys out so making contact with the paint & stare at him untill the lights go red to green, then back to red again. Since then i've grown some balls but depedning on my mood i would either go full on rage (throw bike at windscreen, get arrested etc) or do as the work colleague suggested. I would simply not stand for that now but i find its more extreme in London so both driver & cyclist play off each other only to make the situation worse.
 
You'd be suprised... a lot of motorist don't do this. They normally head up right to the parked car before making a manoeuvre. It's like the are only driving to what is only inches in front of them with no perception of what's ahead. If many of these drivers where motorcyclists, they'd be dead.

This intrigues me, how have you come to the conclusion that this is "normally" what drivers do?
 
This intrigues me, how have you come to the conclusion that this is "normally" what drivers do?

16 years of cycling to the station. Of course, I know where this is going.. You of course are assuming I'm not a driver. I am. Not every driver does.. but a lot.. Drivers see bike, he's going to overtake a parked car and he's going to slow me down.. I'll get there before he does..
 
16 years of cycling to the station. Of course, I know where this is going.. Not every driver does.. but a lot.. Drivers see bike, he's going to overtake a parked car and he's going to slow me down.. I'll get there before he does..

I don't and I know "a lot" of drivers that don't either :p
 
You've clearly never cycled properly on the road if you fail to understand why the Cyclist is allowed this much space by the department of transport.
Stop talking out of your arse, I've cycled to school daily from the age of 10 and cycled a lot before that simply because I was a kid. We have to take a traffic exam at 11 here too for safe cycling...
Let's go through a few reasons shall we:

- Cycling close to the kerb is dangerous. There tend to be drains and potholes, it's also where all the crud and rubbish gets swept to. You've also go the fact that Pedestrians tend to randomly step out into the road, the closer you are to the pavement, the less likely you are going to be able to avoid one when they do this.
Bla bla bla moan moan moan, ohnoes drains and potholes, aaah peds, are you a bloody 3 year old ? You have a brake for a reason, just because you cycle doesn't give you the right to ride at a constant high speed like a moron in any conditions.

You could also clip your pedals causing yourself an accident.
Lol, that's a good one ''me is special, me clip pedal to the kerb'' :rolleyes:. I'm not saying you should be glued in a couple of inches next to the kerb, I'm saying the cyclist is a retard for swerving about in traffic, from the left to the right to the middle etc... Keep to the left more or less... But certainly don't move to the bloody right that you're cycling practically in the center of the road or lane.

- The Highway Code and Department of Transport recommend overtaking a cyclist with as much room as a car because it's safer and doesn't spook the cyclist. This may be something a serious cyclist is used to, but what about children and women as I pointed out in an earlier post. If you buzz them, not only are you frightening them, you could result in them having an accident.
The people who made that recommendation are clearly high, they should take a look at places where cycling WORKS... If they'd recommend a whole car lane for passing a cyclists, cycling would fail here too.
Luckily it is ILLEGAL here for a cyclist to claim a lane and they are legally required to keep to the right as much as possible. This system clearly works if you compare the amount of cyclists here and in the UK, people aren't being little baby's about it either, you barley ever see people wear helmets here for example and you don't hear anyone moaning about hi vis jackets.


- So if a cyclist is up against the kerb in busy traffic how are they supposed to turn right? This is why the Cyclist has the right to be in the primary position because they may need to make a turn. If you stick yourself against the kerb you've got no way of being able to do that.
I'm not sure how it is in the UK, but here the car which goes straight has the right of way, a cyclist has to wait at the side till the cars pass him then turn... In reality this barely happens, cyclists move out from the side to the center of the lane after having looked while stretching their arm out indicating they want to turn, and turn when they can.

Finally, since you referenced this particular incident, need I point out that in the video there are cars taking up the whole left hand lane, meaning the cyclist was the only one who was correctly in his own lane. There was no way he could go any further left if he tried. Idiot.
Exactly, the person who designed that infrastructure should be sacked, the left is for small traffic like cyclists and mopeds and the 2 car lanes should be right of it. Not squeezing a cycle lane between the 2 car lanes, that is clearly a matter of someone having smoked too much pot when designing the street.


Sorry, for a breeze of reality how cycling is supposed to be, you should visit, Belgium or Holland or the north west of Germany or Denmark. Rather than trying to justify cyclists claiming a ridiculous amount of space.
 
Last edited:
Stop talking out of your arse, I've cycled to school daily from the age of 10 and cycled a lot before that simply because I was a kid. We have to take a traffic exam at 11 here too for safe cycling...

I forgot you were from another country, as I remember you from the last time there was a cycling thread.

So the traffic exam is compulsory?
There is no such thing here. We have a cycling proficiency test, this is usually done in schools and when I did it, it was a choice by your parents as to if you wanted to attend.



Bla bla bla moan moan moan, ohnoes drains and potholes, are you a bloody 3 year old ?

Perhaps you aren't aware of the standard of just how bad most of the roads are in this country for cycling?
I've seen comments from European Pro-Cyclists who have come over here and been shocked at just how bad they are, in-regards to traffic and motorists one even said:

"Wow, you Brits have balls, I've never seen anything like how they treat cyclists over here".

How am I acting like a 3 year old by having concerns over potholes?
You realize that they can not only damage bikes, but they can throw you off, injuring you, worse still throwing you into the path of a car behind. That's why when you report a pothole here, the council has to fix it sharpish as they are liable for any accidents that happen.



Lol, that's a good one ''me is special, me clip pedal to the kerb'' :rolleyes:.

No need to be a d**k about it, I'm just saying if you expect cyclists to ride in the gutter, things like that are likely to happen.



The people who made that recommendation are clearly high, they should take a look at places where cycling WORKS... If they'd recommend a whole car lane for passing a cyclists, cycling would fail here too.
Luckily it is ILLEGAL here for a cyclist to claim a lane and they are legally required to keep to the right as much as possible.

Well Marijuana is illegal here in Britain, so road planners won't be smoking anything, certainly not on the job.

The rules are different here.
The Cyclist is allowed to take primary position, or 'claim a lane' as you put it.



I'm not sure how it is in the UK, but here the car which goes straight has the right of way, a cyclist has to wait at the side till the cars pass him then turn... In reality this barely happens, cyclists move out from the side to the center of the lane after having looked while stretching their arm out indicating they want to turn, and turn when they can.

That's not the case here.
The fact that it gets ignored shows that it sounds like it doesn't work.



Exactly, the person who designed that infrastructure should be sacked, the left is for small traffic like cyclists and mopeds and the 2 car lanes should be right of it. Not squeezing a cycle lane between the 2 car lanes, that is clearly a matter of someone having smoked too much pot when designing the street.

I'm not sure what you are talking about?
The video of this incident doesn't even feature a cycle lane.
On most roads in the UK we don't have two lanes for cars traveling the same direction, those are only on Dual Carriageways or Motorways, both of which Cyclists aren't permitted on. I won't deny that there are some badly constructed cycle lanes though, as I have the unfortunate consequence of running into some on my commute to work.



Sorry, for a breeze of reality how cycling is supposed to be, you should visit, Belgium or Holland or the north west of Germany or Denmark. Rather than trying to justify cyclists claiming a ridiculous amount of space.

I'm not trying to justify, I'm just telling it how it is, this is what our government in the UK has outlined as to how motorists should deal with passing cyclists.

I think what you fail to understand, which I earlier pointed out is the difference in culture. Cycling has been big as a means of transport to commute for a long time in Holland, hell there is even a type of bike that is known as a 'Dutch' bike due to their proliferation in the country. People are brought up cycling, it's seen as a much more common way to get to work and like you said yourself you have a test at 11.

In this country cycling has only recently gone through a huge boom, which is why there is suddenly an enormous amount of people on the road. We have only just got street based hire bikes, like some European countries have had for years.

Cyclists may cycle in the gutter in Holland, but I'd wager they get a lot more respect from their fellow motorists, which is what is largely absent in a lot of cases here.
 
If I know someone is going to make a silly overtake where it's unsafe I make sure they can only do it if they kill me, e.g. run me over as I am riding a safe distance from the path, happened last night on a one way single lane bit of road, he was doing to overtake so I made sure he did not, he'd have nearly hit me.
 
So the traffic exam is compulsory?
There is no such thing here. We have a cycling proficiency test, this is usually done in schools and when I did it, it was a choice by your parents as to if you wanted to attend.
Nope, it's a government initiative where kids in primary school simply do a test and can earn a diploma, if they don't nothing happens, but we also did get traffic safety lessons in advance, you're supposed to know the right of way and various rules at a very early age.




Perhaps you aren't aware of the standard of just how bad most of the roads are in this country for cycling?
I've seen comments from European Pro-Cyclists who have come over here and been shocked at just how bad they are, in-regards to traffic and motorists one even said:

"Wow, you Brits have balls, I've never seen anything like how they treat cyclists over here".

How am I acting like a 3 year old by having concerns over potholes?
You realize that they can not only damage bikes, but they can throw you off, injuring you, worse still throwing you into the path of a car behind. That's why when you report a pothole here, the council has to fix it sharpish as they are liable for any accidents that happen.
No need to be a d**k about it, I'm just saying if you expect cyclists to ride in the gutter, things like that are likely to happen.
Perhaps I can't imagine the state of roads there, I've been in London and the roads didn't look too bad tbh, but come on we have very badly paved roads here too and potholes too people don't make such a massive issue out of it.

''brits have balls'' may be so but imho guys like in that vid rather have a death wish than balls...
My own opinion was ''wtf, lol idiots'' when I saw the cyclists in London.

I'm not sure what you are talking about?
The video of this incident doesn't even feature a cycle lane.
On most roads in the UK we don't have two lanes for cars traveling the same direction, those are only on Dual Carriageways or Motorways, both of which Cyclists aren't permitted on. I won't deny that there are some badly constructed cycle lanes though, as I have the unfortunate consequence of running into some on my commute to work.
0:37 in the BBC vid...
I can't understand how the council thought that is a good safe design.


I'm not trying to justify, I'm just telling it how it is, this is what our government in the UK has outlined as to how motorists should deal with passing cyclists.
This is in my opinion, increasing the problem though, cyclists kind of look for problems, I cannot understand why the guy in the vid with the van thing didn't use his brake but instead kept his high speed causing the accident, he could easily have prevented it.

I think what you fail to understand, which I earlier pointed out is the difference in culture. Cycling has been big as a means of transport to commute for a long time in Holland, hell there is even a type of bike that is known as a 'Dutch' bike due to their proliferation in the country. People are brought up cycling, it's seen as a much more common way to get to work and like you said yourself you have a test at 11.
Yes, but I feel the current rules in the UK and especially the behavior of cyclists like in that vid is causing unnecessary problems, cyclists shouldn't be equals to cars or motorbikes... This is causing cars to feel threatened by cyclists, they should be happy they take cars of the road.

Cyclists may cycle in the gutter in Holland, but I'd wager they get a lot more respect from their fellow motorists, which is what is largely absent in a lot of cases here.
Yes, because I don't have to expect cyclists popping up from everywhere, they're ''relatively'' ( well perhaps not in places like Amsterdam, but mostly) organized, they will not do something as ridiculous as overtake me when I'm doing 20-25mph, or block a motorbike or moped trying to overtake them ( see the other vids of the guy from bbc on youtube, he is deliberately holding his ground to prevent motorbikes overtaking him because ''he claimed that space'', he overtakes cars doing quite a high speed or starts shouting aggressively at everyone making a mistake like a moped cutting him up, a person like that would have a major problem here too, he'd be under a car in no time.
 
Last edited:
I ride on the left as close to the kerb as I can, weaving out a little when I have to avoid potholes and drains, when I have to make a right turn I look behind to see how heavy the traffic is in the other lane. If it's too busy I pull up to the kerb and wait for it to clear. If I have a Bus or Truck behind who can't shift to the right in time I just jump off the bike and stand on the kerb untill the traffic had cleared.
 
Back
Top Bottom