Indeed, although in reality rent is actually usually slightly higher than mortgage repayments. silly isn't it, really. backwards perhaps..
How would it possibly work the other way around? Letting property wouldnt work if the cost to finance was > the letting value

One thing that's not been mentioned yet is that, ok, say that you earn 30k and your partner earn's 20k, well that means that you wouldn't be able to go into the mortgage equally most likely. likely event would be that you could put up say 15k towards deposit and she could put up 10k. Personally this wouldn't be acceptable to me. My partner has far more savings than I do because she's 5 years older, even though I earn slightly more than her. I have no intention of going into buying with an unequal share in the property. Just leads to issues down the line...
You do not have to have a legal equal share in a property?
My father was earning something like 20k per year back in 1985 when he bought his current house for 24k at 36 years old. It took him 1 year to save for the deposit and the repayments were less than it would cost to rent back then. Oh, and he got something like a 95% mortgage... Nowadays he's earning 35k but the house is worth 450k and the deposit on it would be something like 70k+. The numbers just don't work.
The numbers dont work because that is not a typical example at all. A house worth 24k in 1985, yet worth 450k in 2011 is HIGHLY abnormal. My parents have a place which they bought in the mid 80's for £210k. It is now worth maybe £750k. Thats only a 3.5 fold increase. 24k did not buy 450k (today) in 1985. Either he bought a total wreck of a shell (which were undervalued then and not accessible to the masses anyway), was VERY lucky, or..whatever. But that is not normal and there lies the problem with that math.
Another issue with those figures is the small matter of the fact that his career looks as though it started well, then fell off a cliff. 20k earnings in 1985 is good! But to only have managed 35k now after all that time and periods of mega inflation is not typical either. Both sets of oposing figures are skewed dramatically to give your desired argument some weight.
Last edited: