Death robot can kill at 2 miles.

Static defences, no matter how advanced are fundamentally flawed.

Uhuh. They're still an essential tool with a massive contribution to make. CCTVs are an example of a static defensive system. Entire wars have been won and lost on the proficiency of static defenses too...
 
Uhuh. They're still an essential tool with a massive contribution to make. CCTVs are an example of a static defensive system. Entire wars have been won and lost on the proficiency of static defenses too...

CCTV's are not static defence they are static intel.

You're probably the type of person who decided to build and garrison the Maginot line. The Atlantic wall didn't help much either.

For should the enemy strengthen his van,
he will weaken his rear; should he strengthen his rear,
he will weaken his van; should he strengthen his left,
he will weaken his right; should he strengthen his right,
he will weaken his left. If he sends reinforcements everywhere,
he will everywhere be weak.
 
THIS THING IS **** TECH.
WE CAN DEVELOP MISSILES THAT CAN BE LAUNCHED FROM MILES AWAY AND BLOW UP A WHOLE CITY.

Rubbish IMO, no offence for OP for trying.

If they were mounted in towers like the old Berlin AAA towers of WW2. That post war could not be destroyed with tons of explosive. It could make a very good defence, very good system if enough were made,
 
future weapons had an automated tank cannon that could fire air burst rounds to explode on inpact or 2 meters inside a concrete re-inforced bunker.

and that would fire rounds at several hundred a minute could be remotely controlled or linked with the systems in various comms systems such as the targgetting systems in the lynx's or apache's w/e they are atm.

if we know about it then it's already been bettered tbh
 
Pair them up and leave in a remote location, have each train a camera on its paired turret to watch for tampering/have a tamper alarm on each. when one gets tampered with have the other take down the theif.
 
It's probably just as effective as the Maginot line in reality.

The Maginot line proved itself to be effective, it forced the Germans to attack else where. If the Maginot line had been built right to the sea as was intended, the German war in the west may have been a failure. The western war was a failure of the west to adopt to mechanized warfare.
 
Someone needs to remind me not to post when I return from a night out!
I was somewhat angry at a 'robbing vending machine' so I thought i'd vent a little :P

It is somewhat useful, but until we start seeing things out of Terminator, I won't be too amazed!
 
THIS THING IS **** TECH.
WE CAN DEVELOP MISSILES THAT CAN BE LAUNCHED FROM MILES AWAY AND BLOW UP A WHOLE CITY.

Rubbish IMO, no offence for OP for trying.

lol your talking about cluster missiles. They are freakin old. We brits have a ****ty nuclear warhead system called trident, it launches 7 nuclear warheads at once in orbit. It sucks imo since its only 7 nukes and countries like Russia and America got 1000's.
 
lol your talking about cluster missiles. They are freakin old. We brits have a ****ty nuclear warhead system called trident, it launches 7 nuclear warheads at once in orbit. It sucks imo since its only 7 nukes and countries like Russia and America got 1000's.

all nuclear missiles are limited to 8 war heads by treaty. (although i think this has been reduced to just 4 now)

Also 8 is more than enough to wipe out most places, heck 1 warhead and is dozens of times more powerful than Hiroshima remember though each submarine carries 16 missiles. (128 warheads total but they don't operate at full capacity as some missiles only have 1 warhead others more for flexibility)

Also trident is the missile not the warhead. (and it;s the same one America uses too)
 
Back
Top Bottom