I agree with you. Instead of being so very forward with this recycling thing they should look at the manufacturers first and get them to reduce packaging.
For a few years now there has been a system to make manufacturers responisble for the packaging they use. They have to buy "Packaging Recovery Notes" from recyclers to account for the ammount of packaging they produce, in effect helping to pay for the waste they create. The target ammout of PRN's they have to buy is increased slightly every year to encourage them to find ways to use less.
However, there is currently an oversupply of PRN's, and as they are traded as a commodity the prices arent that high.
In Norway we got this recycling deal when it comes to plastic and glass bottles that you bring them back to a shop (they all have the machines for it) and then you get something between 10p and 25p for each bottle you recycle. They then get reused and people have an incentive to recycle them too (even if you pay the extra money when you buy the drink)
The revenue generated from collection of domestic recycling will go back to the council to help them offset other costs, so in a way this helps keep your council tax down. You may not see the money going through your hands, but it does make a difference.
I think some of you are missing the point about recycling. The two main issues are a lack of landfill space and the damage that landfill actually causes with regards to leachate and rendering large quantities of land useless.
Recycling is good, landfilling is bad. Even if there isn't an environmental gain to be made by recycling.
This is true. The government taxes waste going to landfill quite highly, and there is a ever decreasing number of sites avaliable. A number of commercial recycling processes are carried out at a loss because it still works out cheaper than sending it to landfill.
PK!