Hahaha, what a load of toss. She's lucky not to have been banned from teaching full stop.
dirtydog said:
There's plenty of white people I know who smell of garlic regardless of whether they wash or not.
Teacher doesn't like smelling children, gets banned.
- Thread starter PGdude
- Start date
- Status
Hahaha, what a load of toss. She's lucky not to have been banned from teaching full stop.
There's plenty of white people I know who smell of garlic regardless of whether they wash or not.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 2,141
In my experience white children usually smell of pickled onion flavoured monster munch.
Personally I'd prefer the curry children.
Personally I'd prefer the curry children.
You should carry around an air freshener to use on such occasions
How would you feel with a foreigner blasting your stinking ass with one?
I think you can safely say that if you are filmed beating children in this country, then you will not be allowed to work with kids again.
To say otherwise is a tad retarded.
I love the way that this has been picked up by the media and th relevant facts of the case thrown aside because of the different cultural types involved.
Lets get some facts straight.
That article is lying. There I said it. Its a lie. The teacher in question never sprayed directly at the children, just in a big circular motion in the air. They enjoyed it and for some of the unruly mob that go to that school it was the only way to get their attention without clouting them.
The teacher in question never said anything like "black ********" The teaching assistant in question is shall we say vexed at her own personal hygiene being called into question and has a grudge against the teacher. The judge knew this, they aren't stupid. Thats the reason it was discredited, because again it was a pack of lies by the teaching assistant, who hopefully will never find employment in a position of trust.
As for the child who wet themselves and was made to stand on paper, what would you do? What can you do? The incident happened 5 minutes or so before hometime, no point in ringing the parents as they would already be there. There are no spare clothes for the children to change into and you aren't allowed to help them change either way, especially when you know there is someone with a grudge who will stop at nothing to discredit you.
The disinfectant is a moot point also. When you have children potting seedlings and getting earth under and on their hands, soap and water won't cut it.
Now, how utterly stupid do you feel for grossly over reacting when you have heard the truth rather than a newspaper article from what can only be described as a comic without a red title.
Lets get some facts straight.
That article is lying. There I said it. Its a lie. The teacher in question never sprayed directly at the children, just in a big circular motion in the air. They enjoyed it and for some of the unruly mob that go to that school it was the only way to get their attention without clouting them.
The teacher in question never said anything like "black ********" The teaching assistant in question is shall we say vexed at her own personal hygiene being called into question and has a grudge against the teacher. The judge knew this, they aren't stupid. Thats the reason it was discredited, because again it was a pack of lies by the teaching assistant, who hopefully will never find employment in a position of trust.
As for the child who wet themselves and was made to stand on paper, what would you do? What can you do? The incident happened 5 minutes or so before hometime, no point in ringing the parents as they would already be there. There are no spare clothes for the children to change into and you aren't allowed to help them change either way, especially when you know there is someone with a grudge who will stop at nothing to discredit you.
The disinfectant is a moot point also. When you have children potting seedlings and getting earth under and on their hands, soap and water won't cut it.
Now, how utterly stupid do you feel for grossly over reacting when you have heard the truth rather than a newspaper article from what can only be described as a comic without a red title.
^ erm.... lol?
No its a question.
You know, the ones that normally show up how shallow your wee head is....
No its a question.
You know, the ones that normally show up how shallow your wee head is....
[citation needed]
It's nothing to do with being unwashed. Your pores secrete what you've eaten or drank the night before hence some people might smell of garlic/onions or others who have been out for a ruby might smell of curry. Many alcoholics smell of alcohol the next day as they sweat it out, even if they shower.
Just to point out that this isn't a case of pupils being unwashed. Diet can drastically affect the way people smell, particularly those with strong spices - an Indian friend of mine at secondary school always had a faint odour of curry about him. It permeates the body and leaks out of the pores - showering before going to school isn't going to change that come midday.
Edit: Beaten
Just more trolling and insults from you but put a wink after it and it's okay
It's not trolling and you still didn't answer my question, may be an insult but I think it's pretty close to the mark.
Certainly seems to be hitting the right nerves.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 14,081
- Location
- Between Realities
A friend of mine once got sprayed with air freshener and a detention for farting too often. Detention for farting, We thought it was hilarious
- Status