Sheeeeesh! Look who's on her period!
Christ, my apologies, I assumed it older as all the newer chips have larger numbers and assumed pattern would follow.
Calling me an idiot for something like that is slightly petty don't you think?
Is overclocking worth decreasing the life of your PC Parts?
- Thread starter CBrooksC
- Start date
Sheeeeesh! Look who's on her period!
Christ, my apologies, I assumed it older as all the newer chips have larger numbers and assumed pattern would follow.
Calling me an idiot for something like that is slightly petty don't you think?
if you can get a 26% increase in performance from a component without affecting its normal operating temperature (because the build up of heat is what damages the components not the voltage) then you would be silly not to monopolise on that facility.
in my case: msi gtx 460 786mb cyclone edition.
its like getting free upgrades except normally overclocking utilises much improved cooling methods over stock cooling
in my case: msi gtx 460 786mb cyclone edition.
its like getting free upgrades except normally overclocking utilises much improved cooling methods over stock cooling
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,521
- Location
- Dormanstown.
Sheeeeesh! Look who's on her period!
Christ, my apologies, I assumed it older as all the newer chips have larger numbers and assumed pattern would follow.
Calling me an idiot for something like that is slightly petty don't you think?
Well, I've seen plenty idiotic and incorrect statements made by yourself.
And you seem to think 2.8GHZ to 4.16GHZ is 560MHZ...
If you don't know what you're talking about, then don't comment.