*** Official FIFA 11 Thread ***

RuMp3l4$k1n said:
sounds like Rangers in europe to me. team bus.
Click to expand...

It's the better players I struggle against, the ones who just constantly pass and run between their front two. I wouldn't mind a sweeper to cover things.

I've said it before but the tactics side of UT annoy me, what if I chose a custom formation I've created, how does my chemistry get affected? I have no idea what it would be?!
 
Could you let me know his name again please? Forgot it. :p

edit - nvm got his name now, will keep an eye on the trade list for it. :)
 
Last edited:
grr another posibly ok offer for Torres...

Forlan ~ 40k
Higuain ~15k
Luis Fabiano (already have and not great resale)
2,900cr

Passed on it for now :(
 
Andybtsn said:
It's the better players I struggle against, the ones who just constantly pass and run between their front two. I wouldn't mind a sweeper to cover things.

I've said it before but the tactics side of UT annoy me, what if I chose a custom formation I've created, how does my chemistry get affected? I have no idea what it would be?!
Click to expand...

You would prob be fine moving to a slightly more secure formation as you never find goals hard to get. Quite like the look of 5-2-2-1 now i've had a look ingame.

3-5-2 has to be the most open formation i've played so far one ball over the top and its trouble time. Still its great fun going forward so I'm sticking to it for now.
 
RuMp3l4$k1n said:
You would prob be fine moving to a slightly more secure formation as you never find goals hard to get. Quite like the look of 5-2-2-1 now i've had a look ingame.

3-5-2 has to be the most open formation i've played so far one ball over the top and its trouble time. Still its great fun going forward so I'm sticking to it for now.
Click to expand...

I have Young and Walcott and want to keep them if possible. I presume 5-2-2-1 will utilise wing backs and not wingers?
 
Andybtsn said:
I have Young and Walcott and want to keep them if possible. I presume 5-2-2-1 will utilise wing backs and not wingers?
Click to expand...

Aye it does, could slot them into the lf/rf roles though with a target man as the ST?

Only formations I can see with proper wingers is 4-3-3 and 3-4-3 which is prob back to square one of being frail at the back.
 
RuMp3l4$k1n said:
Aye it does, could slot them into the lf/rf roles though with a target man as the ST?

Only formations I can see with proper wingers is 4-3-3 and 3-4-3 which is prob back to square one of being frail at the back.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'll try 5 at the back then. Gonna be an expensive "test", especially if it doesn't pay off :(

I tactic cards, position change cards galore!

Just tried it in the second half of a game, the Chemistry I could tell was awful, couldn't pass, move, RUN! But I scored in the 90th min to win 2-1 completely undeserved. I got a message at the end of the game "ur a ****ing *****"

Lol.
 
I think I'm sticking out with 4-1-2-1-2, no matter what formation I try my defenders always fail when the attackers 1-2 pass around me.

Still can't find it K1LL. :/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom