And the use of horses by William the conquaror was against horse and human rights![]()
Absolutely not. The vicious English were willing to fight to the death. The use of horses was the only legitimate reaction.
And the use of horses by William the conquaror was against horse and human rights![]()
Our forefathers fought many wars for the right to vote in governments to make big decisions for us. Our entire modern history is founded on this right to vote in the people to make decisions for us as a country.
The UN is a group of leaders each voted in to make the decision on what is right or wrong and what action needs to be taken. 10 countries voted in favour of taking action, 5 abstained, 0 voted against.
For once the countries of the world took clear concise action which makes me happy, its truly a victory for the system.
.
Define tin foil hat crew? People who don't blindly accept what they are fed, but think instead?
We get the oil and get rid of a homicidal maniac . Win Win if you ask me..
10 countries voted in favour of taking action, 5 abstained, 0 voted against.
For once the countries of the world took clear concise action which makes me happy, its truly a victory for the system.
NO, people who may have a narrow minded bigotted view but who cannot understand that others do not share their paranoia and disbelief, and have to resort to calling them blind as some sort of justification to make their own views better and to try to put down others views.
So 10 countries out of 194 voted for it so I think you will find your statement wrong
And if it's nothing to do with oil when are the 10 super countries going in to Bahrain, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia?
So 10 countries out of 194 voted for it so I think you will find your statement wrong
And if it's nothing to do with oil when are the 10 super countries going in to Bahrain, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia?
So 10 countries out of 194 voted for it so I think you will find your statement wrong
And if it's nothing to do with oil when are the 10 super countries going in to Bahrain, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia?
/confused
They said they used 112 tomahawk missiles. According to a US Navy fact website each costs $569,000. So if you have 112 missiles at that cost, £39million :S Can't be right?
So 10 countries out of 194 voted for it so I think you will find your statement wrong
So 10 countries out of 194 voted for it so I think you will find your statement wrong
And if it's nothing to do with oil when are the 10 super countries going in to Bahrain, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia?
/confused
They said they used 112 tomahawk missiles. According to a US Navy fact website each costs $569,000. So if you have 112 missiles at that cost, £39million :S Can't be right?
/confused
They said they used 112 tomahawk missiles. According to a US Navy fact website each costs $569,000. So if you have 112 missiles at that cost, £39million :S Can't be right?
excellent news
this is exactly the sort of thing the UN is for
protecting those people who are getting smushed into a paste
some of you people are so synical and jaded about oil and not sticking our noses in
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing"
this will level the playing field in Libya, the resolution would allow shooting down planes as well as engaging ground targets like tanks