Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Well coming from a 5870 to a 480 the extra heat and power were indeed worth it for me
The 480 produced better minimum frames and my whole gaming experiences felt smoother,so for a extra 100w on load and im guessing 10c more heat i was more than than happy with my 480.
Of course that my Opinion
Out of interest does that hold true about the minimum frames compared to the current 69** series?
And? If you want to be like that, look at the release of Vista where nVidia couldn't get a driver set right for months, to the point where people couldn't use their 8800s on a Vista PC.It's not really rubbish is it though. Look at the drivers at the time of the 5 series realese, took them a while to get decent ones (Not counting the 5970 as that was later and its a dual card).
You can say what ever you want, it doesn't make it true. Clearly the vast majority of people don't have AMD driver issues, because you'd hear about it more than randomers on forums going on about how their drivers never ever work. The amount of people who have no driver issues vastly outweighs those that do, surely you understand this?Also were are you getting this vast majority of people from? I could always turn that round and say the opposite you know.
It's a common thing for people to ignore nVidia's driver issues when looking at AMD's, and I don't know how you can do this while expecting people to take your posts seriously. If you think the downclocking thing is lazy, what do you call the nVidia driver set that caused cards to overheat? An accident that didn't matter because it was an accident?Of course nVidia drivers aren't perfect either but AMD ones seem lazy in places (bugs such dual monitor downclocking vanishing on 10.4 but then coming back in later drivers).
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but when you're very selective with your examples, you should expect others to point it out.Not trying to provoke or anything just giving my opinion.
Couldn't comment as ive never owned a 69** ATI card,im just commenting on my experiences with both the 480 and the 5870
Couldn't comment as ive never owned a 69** ATI card,im just commenting on my experiences with both the 480 and the 5870
Though i do believe that the 480 is still faster on at least on par with the 6970 on some games.
I have/had both.
480 PWNS 6970
At current prices anyways.
/thread
What about if they were the same price though?
What about if they were the same price though?
I have/had both.
480 PWNS 6970
At current prices anyways.
/thread
480 still. (the Gigabyte one)
Better cooler. better performance and better heat!!!
YES THE 480 IS COOLER!!!
Better performance?
But what about minimums fps, are they better on the GTX480 compared to 69**
roughly the same. 6970 always teeters around 56-60. 480 ALWAYS locked at 60
Have you tried to clock your 480 mate?
Is your card 820mhz ? you might get a far bit more than that with some more voltage .
Card was SOC but also DOA!!
Will RMA and get another one and try again
Youve been very unlucky with GPUs havent you ?![]()