Ok after watching the budget and seeing that duty be increased once more by 2% + inflation there are no doubt that a lot of smokers are going to be pretty annoyed. Now the usual argument against the rises are that they are Net payers into the NHS. I cant remember the exact figures but its something like they cost the NHS £2billion a year but pay in £6billion in duty.
But i was thinking do they really pay extra to the NHS? As lets imagine if everyone suddenly quit smoking now. That money they saved from not smoking does not just disappear. It would simply be spent on alternative things maybe more fuel , Holidays and more entertainment amoung other things.
So after they purchase all these things the government will receive that money back through VAT , Corporation tax's and then taxing the company employees which your money paid for there wage. So in the end that £6billion in duty will just go back into the system but via a different method so they are not paying a net tax receipt for the NHS of £4billion but rather they are still costing £2billion as the money would have gone to the government/NHS budget in one way or anther anyway from the alternative purchases and taxations.
Is this thinking correct. If not why not?
( I would like to add that this has nothing to do with your freedom to do to your body as you wish but more about the fact that a popular argument is that they pay more to the NHS )
But i was thinking do they really pay extra to the NHS? As lets imagine if everyone suddenly quit smoking now. That money they saved from not smoking does not just disappear. It would simply be spent on alternative things maybe more fuel , Holidays and more entertainment amoung other things.
So after they purchase all these things the government will receive that money back through VAT , Corporation tax's and then taxing the company employees which your money paid for there wage. So in the end that £6billion in duty will just go back into the system but via a different method so they are not paying a net tax receipt for the NHS of £4billion but rather they are still costing £2billion as the money would have gone to the government/NHS budget in one way or anther anyway from the alternative purchases and taxations.
Is this thinking correct. If not why not?
( I would like to add that this has nothing to do with your freedom to do to your body as you wish but more about the fact that a popular argument is that they pay more to the NHS )