Ha ha ha really.
No not all religious people think like that not even close. You clearly don't have clue.
Also what's it toto to do with surveying without it, of course we could but that neither here norepinephrine there, it's totally irelavent.
Dutch Ritual Slaughter Ban a Step Closer
- Thread starter philip2009
- Start date
Ha ha ha really.
No not all religious people think like that not even close. You clearly don't have clue.
Also what's it toto to do with surveying without it, of course we could but that neither here norepinephrine there, it's totally irelavent.
No it is not. The ritual consists of the words spoken and the animal must not be dead, Halal is routinely stunned before slaughter.
And this view simply illustrates that you are not qualified to make those assumptions about religion.
It is not whether the individual can live with or without religion, but do we want to be a society that proscribes things simply because some hold a different belief.
You still haven't given a valid reason why we need religion in our society.
Spoken like a true religious bigot...
I don't think it is I who doesn't have a clue!
Absolutely! Just like the bigots who see non believers as beneath them!
Why do we need anything in our society?
So you're a hypocrite, yes?
We need lots of things for the well-being of society but religion isn't one of them!
And you don't think that perhaps the world would be better if we didn't have to deal with either group of bigots obsessed with pushing their unsubstantiated opinions and impossible to prove beliefs onto others?
There doesn't need to be one, there needs to be a void reason to ban something. Shall we ban football no good reason to have it and causes plenty of deaths and injuries. You really are a close minded fool.
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
I support this motion entirely.
Why should I be a hypocrite just because I hold the conviction that society has no need of religion?
Am I a hypocrite because I'd also defend any religious follower from physical attack due to their beliefs?
Some religious people think not believing in anything is also an religion, or something.
How about defending them from there freedom of thoughts and practises(with in reason) something you would like to see banned.
Any as to original post, as long as it's just a ban to killing whilst not stunned then it's not to bad. But still not great as hunting should. Be allowed and far worse from the humane point of view than slitting throat whilst live. People need to realise meat is animals and that they suffer and even hunting is massively more humane than nature. But fir large scale we should be as humane as possible, without banning smaller practices like hunting.
Any as to original post, as long as it's just a ban to killing whilst not stunned then it's not to bad. But still not great as hunting should. Be allowed and far worse from the humane point of view than slitting throat whilst live. People need to realise meat is animals and that they suffer and even hunting is massively more humane than nature. But fir large scale we should be as humane as possible, without banning smaller practices like hunting.
Last edited:
Why should people be labeled bigots simply because they dispute the god theory and see no reason for a need of religion in a society?
I was under the impression these slaughtering methods looked inhumane but were actually better for the animal?
For example
http://meat.tamu.edu/kosher.html
Where as our normal methods are to beat the animal with a stick to "stun" them then kill them?
For example
http://meat.tamu.edu/kosher.html
Where as our normal methods are to beat the animal with a stick to "stun" them then kill them?
Here we go...deflection deflection deflection...
The original argument was about religion, and the way an animal is slaughtered. - not about football!
You're a hypocrite because you agreed that you're bigoted towards religion because of the bigotry you perceive there.