for the overclockers grammar Nazis!

Cosimo · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:28

BloomerzUK · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:29

Christmas, so it is?

nydryl · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:30

Across this miss hit?

V4NT0M · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:31

Accrington Stanley, who are they?

fiveub · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:39

Let us all just say it is true.

nydryl · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:42

Utilises jurally statutes.

powelly · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:46

this epic thread is epic so true is this

j.col · 13 Apr 2011 at 20:47

so true this is?

Deleted member 651465 · 13 Apr 2011 at 21:05

Title is missing a possessive inverted comma? Irony or genius?

Lydzor · 13 Apr 2011 at 21:06

This is not false.

Tomsk · 13 Apr 2011 at 21:09

Thesis sew trew.

[FnG]magnolia · 13 Apr 2011 at 21:53

true true pew pew.

Steveh_monkey · 13 Apr 2011 at 21:57

EVH said:
Title is missing a possessive inverted comma? Irony or genius?

is that true?

Redz · 13 Apr 2011 at 22:02

True innit

Vonhelmet · 13 Apr 2011 at 22:04

EVH said:
Title is missing a possessive inverted comma? Irony or genius?

It's missing two capital letters, certainly, and arguably three if you wanted to capitalise Grammar as part of a proper noun of sorts. The possessive apostrophe could be used if you said "For Overclockers' Grammar Nazis", as then the sentence would be referring to Grammar Nazis belonging to or otherwise affiliated to Overclockers. However, when you say "the Overclockers Grammar Nazis" you are referring merely to Grammar Nazis residing in or at Overclockers.

Consider the case in which the Grammar Nazis are located in Chelsea. In that case, you could refer to "the Chelsea Grammar Nazis" or to "Chelsea's Grammar Nazis".

Chris [BEANS] · 13 Apr 2011 at 22:05

Pancakes

powelly · 13 Apr 2011 at 22:25

vonhelmet said:
It's missing two capital letters, certainly, and arguably three if you wanted to capitalise Grammar as part of a proper noun of sorts. The possessive apostrophe could be used if you said "For Overclockers' Grammar Nazis", as then the sentence would be referring to Grammar Nazis belonging to or otherwise affiliated to Overclockers. However, when you say "the Overclockers Grammar Nazis" you are referring merely to Grammar Nazis residing in or at Overclockers.

Consider the case in which the Grammar Nazis are located in Chelsea. In that case, you could refer to "the Chelsea Grammar Nazis" or to "Chelsea's Grammar Nazis".

you really do live up to your sig! :eek:

franco_22 · 13 Apr 2011 at 22:29

vonhelmet said:
It's missing two capital letters, certainly, and arguably three if you wanted to capitalise Grammar as part of a proper noun of sorts. The possessive apostrophe could be used if you said "For Overclockers' Grammar Nazis", as then the sentence would be referring to Grammar Nazis belonging to or otherwise affiliated to Overclockers. However, when you say "the Overclockers Grammar Nazis" you are referring merely to Grammar Nazis residing in or at Overclockers.

Consider the case in which the Grammar Nazis are located in Chelsea. In that case, you could refer to "the Chelsea Grammar Nazis" or to "Chelsea's Grammar Nazis".

you're scary

jas72 · 14 Apr 2011 at 13:03

[FnG]magnolia;18898171 said:
true true pew pew.

Barney McGrew, cuthbert, dibble, Grub

Marzipanogram · 14 Apr 2011 at 13:35

The first reply by Chuck I:
"Panel 1 should read “I haven’t gotten a comment in weeks.” I can’t contain my rage!"

That just sounds all wrongly to my Britisher ears

I'd have said " ...... I haven't received a comment in weeks".

for the overclockers grammar Nazis!

Deleted member 651465

Deleted member 651465