Why even bother starting the thread if you know all the answers from Geocities (wow there's a blast from the past) already?
All I'll say is, enjoy your expensive honey. Maybe eat less cakes and walk more though.
Probably a load of rubbish, like most 'super foods'.
Well someone sure got out of bed the wrong side didn't they!
I'm afraid the only inaccuracy there is what you have written.![]()
Grade 5 is for general well being, though it heals wounds really well. Even some hospitals are now using it. The higher the grade you go the greater the active content. It is particularly used for topical application when you reach grade 20+.
Well... why don't you have a little google for yourself. Honey has been proven in numerous studies to aid in weight loss in a healthy balanced diet. I have spoken to numerous sports nutritionists who back the claims up.
It is natural sugar in honey, not the refined type found in chocolate etc. Please don't comment on things you clearly have absolutely no understanding of.
OK, what is the "active content"? Name? Formula? Otherwise I also call BS: this is just one step on from the equally quack Royal Jelly. For wound treatment, it works by osmosis - any sterile honey will do the job.
M
The paper I'd read was published last year in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, regarding the effects it has against Staphylococcus aureus, the short version is it works well.
There's more recent research showing it has the ability to kill MRSA due to the interaction with a specific protein (Fabl). Also there is more research, into the effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Needless to say it does work and it's of great interest. No doubt the active ingredients will be purified and patented, but at the moment it's the best these researchers can work with.
Don't knock their work, if it's funded and at university level in the UK then it's respectable research.
How would that make eating it any good? It's not going to magically jump from your mouth to the site of infection![]()
OK, what is the "active content"? Name? Formula? Otherwise I also call BS: this is just one step on from the equally quack Royal Jelly. For wound treatment, it works by osmosis - any sterile honey will do the job.
M
Mentioned in my previous post, "ingesting does diddly squat"![]()
It's possible the idea was that antibiotics are (typically) taken orally for an infection, so ingesting the honey would work in a similar way but I believe it needs to be applied directly to the site of infection as the active molecule isn't your typical antibiotic.
Mentioned in my previous post, "ingesting does diddly squat"![]()
It's possible the idea was that antibiotics are (typically) taken orally for an infection, so ingesting the honey would work in a similar way but I believe it needs to be applied directly to the site of infection as the active molecule isn't your typical antibiotic.
Manuka honey is only beneficial when it's "medical grade", not the stuff you find in holland and barrett etc. IIRC it only works externally too, ingesting it does diddly squat.
It's currently being trialled (and working quite well) in bandages and dressings for its antibacterial properties for wound healing. I'll try and find the paper I read last week if anyone is interested.