Manuka Honey - Benefits??

Why even bother starting the thread if you know all the answers from Geocities (wow there's a blast from the past) already?

All I'll say is, enjoy your expensive honey. Maybe eat less cakes and walk more though.
 
Why even bother starting the thread if you know all the answers from Geocities (wow there's a blast from the past) already?

All I'll say is, enjoy your expensive honey. Maybe eat less cakes and walk more though.

There's always one smart *** isn't there! I didn't say I knew all the answers, I said I knew (regular) honey helped in aid of weight loss. I was asking the health benefits of (manuka) honey.

So please read and understand the question before jumping in with your stupid comments. With regards to your quip about eating less cakes and walking more. When I said I wanted to lose a little weight, I ment a few lbs. I'm a perfectly healthy weight, I am training for a judo competition and trying to make a certain weight category.

Everyones a hard man behind their keyboard these days. ****No personal attacks****
 
Well someone sure got out of bed the wrong side didn't they!

It's all this honey. It increases your immune system and helps fight off bacterial infections. Unfortunately it lowers tolerance levels for (.)(.)'s

A price I'll have to pay unfortunately!

I'm off out for this evening. You have fun now on the forums this fine Saturday night. ;)
 
Grade 5 is for general well being, though it heals wounds really well. Even some hospitals are now using it. The higher the grade you go the greater the active content. It is particularly used for topical application when you reach grade 20+.
 
Grade 5 is for general well being, though it heals wounds really well. Even some hospitals are now using it. The higher the grade you go the greater the active content. It is particularly used for topical application when you reach grade 20+.



OK, what is the "active content"? Name? Formula? Otherwise I also call BS: this is just one step on from the equally quack Royal Jelly. For wound treatment, it works by osmosis - any sterile honey will do the job.


M
 
Well... why don't you have a little google for yourself. Honey has been proven in numerous studies to aid in weight loss in a healthy balanced diet. I have spoken to numerous sports nutritionists who back the claims up.

It is natural sugar in honey, not the refined type found in chocolate etc. Please don't comment on things you clearly have absolutely no understanding of.

There's no call for rudeness. Why don't you post the studies (if they really exist). And why are you creating a thread asking people what the benefits are, when you act as though you are a honey authority and slate everyone who dares speak out against your precious honey?

Secondly sugar in honey is the same as sugar in chocolate, glucose and fructose. Refined just means purified, it's the same natural chemical.

OK, what is the "active content"? Name? Formula? Otherwise I also call BS: this is just one step on from the equally quack Royal Jelly. For wound treatment, it works by osmosis - any sterile honey will do the job.


M

It's Methylglyoxal.

www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf7/K072956.pdf
 
Last edited:
The paper I'd read was published last year in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, regarding the effects it has against Staphylococcus aureus, the short version is it works well.

There's more recent research showing it has the ability to kill MRSA due to the interaction with a specific protein (Fabl). Also there is more research, into the effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Needless to say it does work and it's of great interest. No doubt the active ingredients will be purified and patented, but at the moment it's the best these researchers can work with.

Don't knock their work, if it's funded and at university level in the UK then it's respectable research.

e: I'm usually the first to dive in to finding evidence against "health food/alternative medicine" because the majority of it is utter balls, however the research being carried out is of a high quality and not anecdotal, eventually this will make its way from alternative medicine to conventional medicine.
 
Last edited:
The paper I'd read was published last year in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, regarding the effects it has against Staphylococcus aureus, the short version is it works well.

There's more recent research showing it has the ability to kill MRSA due to the interaction with a specific protein (Fabl). Also there is more research, into the effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Needless to say it does work and it's of great interest. No doubt the active ingredients will be purified and patented, but at the moment it's the best these researchers can work with.

Don't knock their work, if it's funded and at university level in the UK then it's respectable research.

How would that make eating it any good? It's not going to magically jump from your mouth to the site of infection :p
 
How would that make eating it any good? It's not going to magically jump from your mouth to the site of infection :p

Mentioned in my previous post, "ingesting does diddly squat" ;)

It's possible the idea was that antibiotics are (typically) taken orally for an infection, so ingesting the honey would work in a similar way but I believe it needs to be applied directly to the site of infection as the active molecule isn't your typical antibiotic.
 
OK, what is the "active content"? Name? Formula? Otherwise I also call BS: this is just one step on from the equally quack Royal Jelly. For wound treatment, it works by osmosis - any sterile honey will do the job.


M

I bet you'd happily accept the conventional pharmaceutical approach? ;)
 
Mentioned in my previous post, "ingesting does diddly squat" ;)

It's possible the idea was that antibiotics are (typically) taken orally for an infection, so ingesting the honey would work in a similar way but I believe it needs to be applied directly to the site of infection as the active molecule isn't your typical antibiotic.

so in reality you'd be much better off using the alcohol gel hand washes that don't leave a residue than slathering yourself in honey :o
 
Mentioned in my previous post, "ingesting does diddly squat" ;)

It's possible the idea was that antibiotics are (typically) taken orally for an infection, so ingesting the honey would work in a similar way but I believe it needs to be applied directly to the site of infection as the active molecule isn't your typical antibiotic.

Whaaaaaat, all the way back on the first page? Effort :p

Not that I'm clued up on the actual specific nitty gritty here, but I imagine the idea of ingesting it and it working as a bit like the idea that ingesting a caulimovirus 35 promoter will give you cancer :p
 
Manuka honey is only beneficial when it's "medical grade", not the stuff you find in holland and barrett etc. IIRC it only works externally too, ingesting it does diddly squat.

It's currently being trialled (and working quite well) in bandages and dressings for its antibacterial properties for wound healing. I'll try and find the paper I read last week if anyone is interested.

Regular honey has anti bacterial properties and has been used on wounds for centuries, also has a use for soothing sore throats - whats so special about this 'Manuka' honey?

Also we've since developed antiseptics that are a tad more practical than honey.
 
Back
Top Bottom