I would mention autism in a spate of pedantry, but I'll refrain.
I do agree on the principle though, there's been a lot of ironic arrogance within this thread.
snowdog is correct. You can't interpret it any other way.
The question is 6/2(1+2) which is (6/2)*(1+2). Apply bidmas. Ans = 9.
The question is NOT 6/(2(1+2)), in which case it would be 1.
I was joking in my own odd sort of way, as if asimwhatever was imagining those voting '1' as number-crunching Rainmen or something... which of course is giving him far too much credit.There may be some correlation between the two, but you can't assume it.
bi(dm)(as)
Why, it says
6/2(1+2)
not
6/(2(1+2))
6/2(1+2) Automatically means (6/2)*(1+2).
In most calculators anyhow. And I've been learned to follow that.
Just type it in your casio or texas instruments graphical calc or in google and it will always say 9.
This one or very similar is all over the place causing some quite funny rows. It's ambiguous, it's designed to be ambiguous. However as an Engineer I simply cannot persuade myself to disassociate the bracketed term and because I can legitimately expand the equation 6÷2(2+1) > 6÷(2x2+1x2) then I'd have to say 1.
But does it automatically mean that? Why doesn't it automatically mean 6/(2+4)
And my calculator seems to think it's 1.
You should really accept the facts that, it can be interpreted either way and the other fact that it doesn't matter.
Afaik they're equal, but the calculators I've tried automatically make :* takes precedence over /
That is odd, however, I've never heard of
Why does one calculator do the one and the other does it differently ?
So far:
TI, Casio, Google
vs
Apple
The calculator stances on this.
My initial thoughts were the answer is 9 but spreadsheet says 1! Having read the thread I agree the equation is ambiguous and both answers could be correct depending on how you interpret it.
Without any symbols, it's utterly ambiguous. The bracketing is inconsistent and there's no multiplication sign. It's badly written specifically to generate arguments like this one.
Your version requires you to assume that the 6/2 is bracketed before you multiply out the (1+2), but that's no more valid than assuming that the 2(1+2) is bracketed, given the inconsistent manner in which the thing is written under your rules.
If they wanted it to mean (6/2)*(2+1) then the first part should be bracketed, given that they've gone to the trouble of bracketing the second half.
The question is a troll.
My calculator is a casio fx 9860G SD
which is (was?) one of the best graphical calculators you can (could?) buy.
My calculator is a casio fx 9860G SD
which is (was?) one of the best graphical calculators you can (could?) buy.
You have added in an extra '*' there.
You have added in an extra '*' there.
It's not ambiguous. My understanding of BODMAS is where there is equality you go left to right. Here the division and multiplication rank equally. Therefore leftmost operator takes precedence. Therefore, according to those rules, you divide before you multiply in this equation.