Do you think his intention was to kill?
A push? I wouldn't have called it heavy handed. What happened after was circumstantial.. I could argue with the Mrs and have a heart attack afterwards but it doesn’t make her a murderer..
I don't agree with any miss use of authority by the police but given the circumstances and the degree of the events unfolding I think they were right to use force to maintain control.. Our police service needs all the backing it can get, this, and it's only my opinion, only undermines their authority.
A push? I wouldn't have called it heavy handed. What happened after was circumstantial.. I could argue with the Mrs and have a heart attack afterwards but it doesn’t make her a murderer..
I don't agree with any miss use of authority by the police but given the circumstances and the degree of the events unfolding I think they were right to use force to maintain control.. Our police service needs all the backing it can get, this, and it's only my opinion, only undermines their authority.
I've worked in the city when riots have been going on right on outside our front door. It's not pleasant. Ian Tomlinson knew exactly what he was doing; walking in front of a riot line is like racing over rail crossing with barriers down.
That is a separate issue in my opinion.The problem is though that the policeman lied and changed his story several times throughout the inquest.
A push? I wouldn't have called it heavy handed. What happened after was circumstantial.. I could argue with the Mrs and have a heart attack afterwards but it doesn’t make her a murderer..
I don't agree with any miss use of authority by the police but given the circumstances and the degree of the events unfolding I think they were right to use force to maintain control.. Our police service needs all the backing it can get, this, and it's only my opinion, only undermines their authority.
I've worked in the city when riots have been going on right on outside our front door. It's not pleasant. Ian Tomlinson knew exactly what he was doing; walking in front of a riot line is like racing over rail crossing with barriers down.
The CPS being regarded as some form of police protection service is laughable, however that is perhaps another debate.
walking in front of a riot line is like racing over rail crossing with barriers down.
I'm with Huddy on this.
The video shows it was more than just a push. It was a serious shove, from behind, that sent the man flying to the floor and caused enough trauma to bring on his death.A push? I wouldn't have called it heavy handed. What happened after was circumstantial.. I could argue with the Mrs and have a heart attack afterwards but it doesn’t make her a murderer..
Maintain control of what? A man walking along, facing the other way, with his hands in his pockets? There was nothing to control, let alone with force. The police service needs backing, sure, but giving it carte blanche to go around assaulting members of the public isn't the way to do it.I don't agree with any miss use of authority by the police but given the circumstances and the degree of the events unfolding I think they were right to use force to maintain control. Our police service needs all the backing it can get, this, and it's only my opinion, only undermines their authority.
It's not at all like that. It wasn't a riot line, it was some officers in a group. They are not in any formation. Ian Tomlinson was walking along, in front of them, in the direction they wanted him to move. What more did they want from him? The officers use of force actually increased the amount of time it took for Tomlinson to get out of the way and just stirred up more anger in the crowds. The officer's actions did not help the situation at all. It was, evidently, the worst possible thing he could have done.I've worked in the city when riots have been going on right on outside our front door. It's not pleasant. Ian Tomlinson knew exactly what he was doing; walking in front of a riot line is like racing over rail crossing with barriers down.
It is also a shame the public never to hear about the malicious complaints made against serving Police Officers.
That doesn't sell papers though does it ?
I have been the subject of a malicious complaint, served with disciplinary papers and a related court case had me reamed in the witness box for two hours and warned to calm down by the judge.
My recourse for such a malicious complaint ? Nothing. Goes with the territory. Deal with it.
As for Pc Harwood, his actions were appalling. He and another officer could have taken an arm each and walked him away. There were no justifications for striking him or pushing him.