I am planning on getting a NAS, I have been been mulling over which one to get for a couple of months now and I've almost certainly decided on the Qnap TS-419p+. However I have seen a couple of reviews which pit it against the Qnap TS-439 Pro II+ and the more expensive model does have some real performance gains on it's cheaper counterpart.
I intend on mainly using the NAS for Bittorrent, streaming HD video content to a couple of locations in the house (simultaneously) and occasionally moving large (~120GB) files to and from the device. The TS-439 Pro II+ is £170 more than the TS-419p+, I would love to run to a TS-459 Pro II but I just can't afford that.
Considering I want to keep this device for a long time and have as 'futureproof' a product as I can manage, is the extra potential expense justified do you think?
I intend on mainly using the NAS for Bittorrent, streaming HD video content to a couple of locations in the house (simultaneously) and occasionally moving large (~120GB) files to and from the device. The TS-439 Pro II+ is £170 more than the TS-419p+, I would love to run to a TS-459 Pro II but I just can't afford that.
Considering I want to keep this device for a long time and have as 'futureproof' a product as I can manage, is the extra potential expense justified do you think?