Osama bin Laden is dead - no graphic/violent images.

[TW]Fox · 3 May 2011 at 20:59

arknor said:
personal attack?

Err, no.

TicTac · 3 May 2011 at 21:00

Well looks like the Hapiness at OBL`s Demise just keeps on comin....
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...ince_911_vowed_to_grow_beard_until_bin_l.html

arknor · 3 May 2011 at 21:01

[TW]Fox;19047553 said:
Err, no.

seemed like it... i guess when you cant discuss you can discredit though eh..

.still, .like, .to, .see, .where, .i, .have, .been, .suportive, .on, .bin, .laden, .in, .this, .thread, :mad:

Castiel · 3 May 2011 at 21:03

cheets64 said:
I didn't know a lot of you have served in the special forces.

Maybe not a lot.......

[TW]Fox · 3 May 2011 at 21:04

arknor said:
seemed like it...

It's hardly a personal attack, it's more a descriptive analysis of your posting style

Had you been a bit less keen to scream 'personal attack' perhaps the best response would have been to criticise the ridiculously long sentance I'd inadverently managed to post and point out that such a sentance makes me a bit hypocritical

Castiel · 3 May 2011 at 21:07

arknor said:
big difference between an embassy siege and an attack on the home of a terorist especially when he wasnt armed or a threat to anyone at the time

How on earth do you know what the level of threat was?

arknor · 3 May 2011 at 21:07

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13274176
0:40 another local saying how anyone entering the area was always checked for ID cards and asked where you lived etc.

How on earth do you know what the level of threat was?

because the whitehouse said he was unarmed ?
are navy seals not trained in armed combat?

loltim · 3 May 2011 at 21:07

[TW]Fox;19047598 said:
It's hardly a personal attack, it's more a descriptive analysis of your posting style Had you been a bit less keen to scream 'personal attack' perhaps the best response would have been to criticise the ridiculously long sentance I'd inadverently managed to post and point out that such a sentance makes me a bit hypocritical

sentence.

[TW]Fox · 3 May 2011 at 21:08

loltim said:
sentence.

arknor, take note.

That > 'waaa, personal attack'.

Robbo · 3 May 2011 at 21:08

Castiel said:
How on earth do you know what the level of threat was?

He's an armchair marine.

Dewotter · 3 May 2011 at 21:10

Robbo said:
He's an armchair marine.

To be fair we all are, we weren't there.

teaboy5 · 3 May 2011 at 21:10

arknor said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13274176
0:40 another local saying how anyone entering the area was always checked for ID cards and asked where you lived etc.

because the whitehouse said he was unarmed ?
are navy seals not trained in armed combat?

Again who cares? Pull him up against a wall and shoot him! We are hardly talking about someone who stole some pick-a-mix here.

aspirins · 3 May 2011 at 21:11

arknor said:
seemed like it... i guess when you cant discuss you can discredit though eh..

.still, .like, .to, .see, .where, .i, .have, .been, .suportive, .on, .bin, .laden, .in, .this, .thread,

Can't complain about punctuation any more, he's mastered it.

arknor · 3 May 2011 at 21:11

[TW]Fox;19047638 said:
arknor, take note.

That > 'waaa, personal attack'.

you pretty much incinuated i am some retard because i dont use grammar and therefore whatever i say doesnt matter.

seems like you all just skip my post anyway becasuse you claim im suportive of osama yet non of my posts are...
still waiting for you or tefal to show where i have been suported of osama?

Again who cares? Pull him up against a wall and shoot him! We are hardly talking about someone who stole some pick-a-mix here.

no point discussing anything then lets just closeb the thread

/thread teaboy5 has the final say

TicTac · 3 May 2011 at 21:12

Not to point at anyone but the only reason the Whitehouse knew he was unarmed was because 6-10 highly trained Navy SEALs had just kicked the front door off its hinges.

Hindsight being the wonderful thing it is it was probably a good idea they took the machine guns and grenades instead of the tickling sticks and some Haribo Tangfastics.

arknor · 3 May 2011 at 21:13

TicTac said:
Not to point at anyone but the only reason the Whitehouse knew he was unarmed was because 6-10 highly trained Navy SEALs had just kicked the front door off its hinges.

Hindsight being the wonderful thing it is it was probably a good idea they took the machine guns and grenades instead of the tickling sticks and some Haribo Tangfastics.

threads closed move along

Castiel · 3 May 2011 at 21:14

Robbo said:
He's an armchair marine.

So it seems.

Whether Osama Bin Laden was armed personally or not doesn't specifically decide the threat level of an operation.

teaboy5 · 3 May 2011 at 21:14

arknor said:
you pretty much incinuated i am some retard because i dont use grammar and therefore whatever i say doesnt matter.

seems like you all just skip my post anyway becasuse you claim im suportive of osama yet non of my posts are...
still waiting for you or tefal to show where i have been suported of osama?

no point discussing anything then lets just closeb the thread

/thread teaboy5 has the final say

They going at you because your banging on about how it wasn't right they shot him while he was unarmed.

Castiel · 3 May 2011 at 21:14

RKO said:
To be fair we all are, we weren't there.

Some have some actual experience however.

[TW]Fox · 3 May 2011 at 21:15

arknor said:
you pretty much incinuated

No, I made a lighthearted comment about an imaginary situation and how you might respond to it