If 100,000 people vote, there will only be 100,000 votes at the end of the counting.
Yes at the end or even in each round, again how will the stats look, it won't equal 100,000 will it.
If 100,000 people vote, there will only be 100,000 votes at the end of the counting.
Liar no, just completely misses the point and sticks with a half thought out idea, just like you. Just because each round you only get one vote, doesn't mean over the entire course you only get one. Again have a think about what the stats will show.http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=19062174
Are you claiming the author of the source i quoted, Roger Mortimore from ipsos mori is a liar? Yes or No answer
Lol, I'm shocked you guys still have the will to converse with Bunny, what's the point?!
It's not fact at all.
How will the stats look at the end, some votes are counted multiple times. That is fact and those stats will have influence on future policies and parties as a whole.
Now you may not see that as a problem, but you can not deny some people will get multiple votes. The thing is av is not need, national vote and as such it would be some sort of PR system. Then you don't need all this rubbish.
A vote of the above would out of play pretty quickly in AV, and one of the No Camps arguments is that AV will give extremist minorities more power. The above will have the extremist numpty essentially have no say, just like they currently would with FPTP.
Extremist minorities still get shafted with AV, and the more convetionally "agreeable" voters will have a better way to express their feelings and preferences.
You never answered me a number of pages back when I asked if you were dvdbunny. Are you?
But that isn't on the cards. I don't think very many people voting Yes see AV as the end goal, rather it's the starter pistol to get us there.
All votes are counted multiple times unless you get to a round where all your preferences have been eliminated and no one has 50% yet.
Agree it's not one vote, if it was one coyote, the stats would reflect that. But they won't, what they really mean is one vote per round, which is Tyne point and not one vote.
Only way to get what most people want is national voting, where you can really just pick who you want and they will get the seats.
BDEE.
Thanks for asking.
Your MP is supposed to be your local representative in Parliament, how is it wrong that this person is someone with the most support from the electorate? I see it as fundamentally wrong that in a democracy a representative can be elected with only a plurality (and not a majority) of applicable votes.That is only part of the debate though.
My initial concern and my biggest reason for voting no, is what I consider people getting multiple votes. There is no need to got back over the "AV is ONE vote" argument becauase it has been done, but I do not see it as one vote - IN MY OPINION It is people getting another go because thier candidate didnt win, which I see as fundamentaly wrong in democracy.
Your MP is supposed to be your local representative in Parliament, how is it wrong that this person is someone with the most support from the electorate? I see it as fundamentally wrong that in a democracy a representative can be elected with only a plurality (and not a majority) of applicable votes.
You can't say its not one vote.
That would be second guessing how everyone uses AV.
You can't.
Oh king of the pendants, eh?
Well if you have arrived within the month, and aren't a dup, how do you have such extensive historic knowledge of other posters to have the ability to claim other people are using various monikers?
Pish twaddle, that's what.
Your MP is supposed to be your local representative in Parliament, how is it wrong that this person is someone with the most support from the electorate? I see it as fundamentally wrong that in a democracy a representative can be elected with only a plurality (and not a majority) of applicable votes.
Yes at the end or even in each round, again how will the stats look, it won't equal 100,000 will it.
Then why are you voting yes to AV when the same can (and will) happen? It might happen less but in the seats where AV will most likely make the difference the end result the likelyhood is that the MP will still be returned on a plurality (or relative majority) rather than an absolute majority.
Yes it will. If 100 votes are cast, at the end of each round, 100 votes are on the score board. Where a voter has given a next preference, the vote is moved to that party. Where no preference is listed, the vote stays with that dead party.