yes you are and tbh it looks pathetic.
Read the thread?
yes you are and tbh it looks pathetic.
Are you intentionally being ironic?

Read the thread?
No - I'm saying you obviously need to think of others on the road. If you drive/ride thinking that everyone else is a bit slow on the uptake, your driving/riding will be that much better, giving you a much wider margin for others errors![]()
Grow up will you. There is a discussion taking place, you are trying to drag it down into the gutter.

I meant by making such childish posts.

I just find it hard to comprehend a situation that is described as "daylight" and where 50mph was possible, as being really as bad as you make it sound :/ Sorry.
This was the M4 in December during a blizzard, visibility was down to 10 meters at times, 15 mph absolute tops all the way from Wales to Swindon.
![]()
We managed without any fogs at all. We could see the cars behind, they could see us. No need for them.
So, you are not willing to take on board any criticism (constructive or otherwise) at all?
Meh - good luck and don't kill anyone![]()
He's 25. Not a juvenile?
Still trying to be condescending, how good of you.

Question (sorry to interrupt the argument!):
On my Saxo (and also a Clio I was changing a bulb on) the rear lights only have a fog light fitted on one side. Both sides have identical lamp units and boards and wiring, just only one side actually has a bulb fitted. It's been like this from the factory. Have I just been unlucky and the frenchies saved 10p by only fitting one rear fog light bulb, or is there some reason to only fit one? On the Clio I had a spare bulb so just stuck it in and it worked fine with a bulb on each side!

I tried constructive criticism, but that didn't work.
I know that juveniles feel threatened when placed into situations they don't feel comfortable.
My point is, that a fog light in that sort of situation would have made a car easier to discern at longer distance. I'm not saying I couldn't see cars at all without one on, but it was easier to track the movements of cars around me through the rain and spray when they were showing brighter lights.
An example....coming up to a joining slip road. Usually, I tend to move over to the right if I see traffic attempting to join, to make it as easy for them to join the traffic flow. This is something that requires you look ahead toward the slip, to see the car in plenty of time, and plan moving over.
In the visibility I am describing, yes, I could see cars, but I can see them from further off when they are showing a fog light....the eye is drawn to the light first, and can discern that more easily against the more opaque background. They aren't needed, I fully realise that. But in the situation the road was in today, it was a real help, and not off putting.
Yes, dabbing the brakes on a motorway, if I feel someone is following too closely....much safer![]()

Conscript - posts 71 & 72 about mirrors - I was expanding my comments about post 68.
Have you ever followed a car with rear '''fogs''' on? Do you not find it distracting?
Just trying to make the roads a bit safer.
You missed the point, but what is safer in your opinion? a prolonged dazzling or a brief flash of light to wake up the driver that really you shouldn't be worrying that much about in the first place![]()