Permabanned
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2009
- Posts
- 1,288
A generic question really; When purchasing a used car, how important is mileage on said car and is there like a 'guideline' that you should be looking at?
ie for someone reason I recall someone saying look at 10k per year of the cars life.... so have always sort of looked at that. PLUS ive also thought anything over 50k in the sort of 3-4-5 year old category is not worth touching.
Now is it easy as categorising it as above, or are different car brands better at staying lively with more mileage on?
I just wondered if ive ruled out cars because of the mileage factor, when in reality my expectations have been wrong.
Ill add some examples ive seen on autotrader that maybe i would rule out:
Range Rover Sport 4.2 V8 - 05 Reg - 69000 on the clock
Porsche 911 996 2004 - 45000 on the clock ( i know this is under what my logic states, but for a 'luxury brand sports car' it worries me even more!)
ie for someone reason I recall someone saying look at 10k per year of the cars life.... so have always sort of looked at that. PLUS ive also thought anything over 50k in the sort of 3-4-5 year old category is not worth touching.
Now is it easy as categorising it as above, or are different car brands better at staying lively with more mileage on?
I just wondered if ive ruled out cars because of the mileage factor, when in reality my expectations have been wrong.
Ill add some examples ive seen on autotrader that maybe i would rule out:
Range Rover Sport 4.2 V8 - 05 Reg - 69000 on the clock
Porsche 911 996 2004 - 45000 on the clock ( i know this is under what my logic states, but for a 'luxury brand sports car' it worries me even more!)