Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Watch the gameplay videos, it looks like it works nicely.

You have the RDS, and you can click on the scope to give extra zoom. In the gamelay video he also has grip, and extended mags!!! :eek:

biron,

FourZeroTwo also said some information is true, some is false, I suspect weapon models to be true, but a lot of the MP perks/KS could be total BS.
 
anticonscience said:
biron,

FourZeroTwo also said some information is true, some is false, I suspect weapon models to be true, but a lot of the MP perks/KS could be total BS.
Click to expand...

I think the MP maps named on kotaku may be true as well. In Spunk3's video the lad says he played on Dome and that is named on kotaku.
 
Why didn't they atleast try to move the SP on from something they can knock up in 5 minutes?

We all know the MP will sell the game anyway so why not take a risk?

2-4 player co-op and make the game atleast slightly different to the game we played when the first COD game came out on the 360.

Survival mode 2 player co-op, come on they haven't even tried.

MP aside, the rest of the game is leagues behind the competition. Yet this game has been thrown together with nothing in mind apart from taking a billion dollars in a weekend.

Why are people saying the guns and feel is exactly the same as MW2, because it is exactly the same with a couple of gun alterations that could have been a patch.

Not that I blame them, the pressure was on to get this game done for the yearly release and after the IW fallout and the time frame it would be hard to make major changes.

The worst thing about the COD series no matter who makes it is the single player, it needs a major refresh. For a combat game using such major weapons it needs to be more than a point to point checkpoint shooter. They could do so much more with what is a pretty good looking smooth shooter, surely by now it should atleast have the option to play in co-op?
 
I'd like to see a single player overhaul... maybe even start again from it's roots in World War 2.

Or maybe a futuristic one?

Definatley try and get it off it's rails type system... maybe head towards a Fallout 3/Arma type feel but without the RPG intensity if that makes any sense.
 
I love the modern warfare setting but I agree they need to make changes to the single player game, it just hasn't progressed at all.

5 hours of find the the checkpoint and then it's over.
 
Wyrdo said:
No more WW2!
Click to expand...

COD2 was my fav SP campaign but the weapons obviously limit the bazillion KS that infinity ward like.

The modern setting works better for MP, I like the WW2 setting but it's not worth re-doing how the current system is set up. So many other games do it better in a ww2 era. Even brothers in arms is a better SP ww2 experience.

Lucas arts should just pay one of these cod companies to re-skin the game in star wars world and atleast give it a refresh in a different era ;)

Air strikes would be so much cooler if it was a tie bombing run ;)

It would give them a futuristic game that would out sell any game ever made.
 
Yeah actually, I much prefer the modern setting for MP but didn't mind the WW2 games in SP. CoD2 and Brothers in Arms were great WW2 campaigns.

Though I do think WW2 was done to death,
 
I don't get how the COD SP games score well. I can only think because people only half care on the way to the MP features.

It was forgivable on COD2 because it was the first try on a new console.

Most other games have evolved, even GRAW 1 you had a team of guys you could direct, send to various points and designate the type of fire you wanted them to carry out. R6 in breach you could chose how.

There's little wrong with the COD MW engine but in co-op or a team you could move it would actually be a very good interesting game I reckon. This was shown in spec ops, the sniper level was infinately more fun in co-op. One of you moving while the other was trying to spot the hidden snipers. Covering fire from a heli or AC-130.

Even Halo has evolved, Gears has. Yet with COD then seem happy to bang out a 6 hour game with nothing new. As though your not supposed to care because in 6 hours you will be playing MP anyway. I'm mostly a single player gamer so find it frustrating that they don't make use of the game when they have a decent engine, very good sound but such a linear on rails SP.
 
i find most SP games boring now,all you seem to have to do now is get to check point to checkpoint,especially with cod games,It doesnt really matter what level you have it on,just try to reach a checkpoint then bomb on to the next one.I find myself not even enjoying the SP story or anything i just want it finished so i can play MP.
 
dannyjo22 said:
SNIP!
Click to expand...

I really couldn't care less about COD SP. I played about an hour of Black Ops before giving up. I probably won't even bother with this campaign. Not straight away anyway. BF3 campaign looks like it'll be much better.
I really wish you could just download the MP bit for £20 or something and just play that.
I agree they need to try something new. A proper co-op campaign would be nice. Or maybe make the levels more open with different way of tackling them.
One of the better SP campaigns i've played recently was Crysis 2. I liked the fact it gave you options to as to how to complete each level.
 
Even more info


(and no swearies this time Thundycat ;))

There is some interesting info in there that answers some of the questions put up by Biron and Danny about some sort of Objective reward.
 
Last edited:
Robert Bowling tweeted a while ago that IW has nothing against Sniping.

It would be madness though if they released the game with the same tools that allowed so many useless bushes running around with spas12's like in MW2 and doing helicopter tricks of all rooftops.

That would be a big fail on IW part if the game turned in to that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom