Right, I might think about the i5-2500K (OEM or standard) then and see what the prices are when I come to order - if the standard one is cheaper (or only marginlly more) then its probably worth it for the 3 year warranty - even if I don't use the cooler. But I'll have to see.
As to the case, I might buy that in a store where I can actually go and see it.
Sounds like the z68 is the way to go.
About the hard drives - general consensus is that the Samsung is better. I believe you guys, but would someone explain why?
Samsung: Samsung SpinPoint F3 500GB SATA-II 16MB Cache - OEM (HD502HJ) [HD502HJ]
- Capacity: 500GB
- Cache: 16MB
- Interface: SATA-II
- Spin Speed: 7200RPM
- Seek Time: 8.9ms
WD Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB SATA 6Gb/s 16MB Cache - OEM (WD5000AAKX) [WD5000AAKX]
- Backwards compatible with SATA-II
- Capacity: 500GB
- Cache: 16MB
- Interface: SATA 6Gb/s
- Spin Speed: 7200RPM
- Seek Time: 8.9ms
So, as far as I can see (not very far) they are the same except the WD is SATA 6Gb/s whereas the Samsung is only SATA II (3Gb/s).
As to the case, I might buy that in a store where I can actually go and see it.
Sounds like the z68 is the way to go.
About the hard drives - general consensus is that the Samsung is better. I believe you guys, but would someone explain why?
Samsung: Samsung SpinPoint F3 500GB SATA-II 16MB Cache - OEM (HD502HJ) [HD502HJ]
- Capacity: 500GB
- Cache: 16MB
- Interface: SATA-II
- Spin Speed: 7200RPM
- Seek Time: 8.9ms
WD Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB SATA 6Gb/s 16MB Cache - OEM (WD5000AAKX) [WD5000AAKX]
- Backwards compatible with SATA-II
- Capacity: 500GB
- Cache: 16MB
- Interface: SATA 6Gb/s
- Spin Speed: 7200RPM
- Seek Time: 8.9ms
So, as far as I can see (not very far) they are the same except the WD is SATA 6Gb/s whereas the Samsung is only SATA II (3Gb/s).






















