Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 3,027
Im guessing it evaporates, but then if thats the case, why does the concrete not shrink by much?
so it becomes the concrete? surely then whenever we lay concrete we are using up water which can never be replaced.. and surely then if we keep laying concrete then maybe one day there will be none left ?!
Yes. In theory we would run out of water if we keep laying concrete, but I have a feeling that we would have to lay an awful lot of concrete in order to achieve this.so it becomes the concrete? surely then whenever we lay concrete we are using up water which can never be replaced.. and surely then if we keep laying concrete then maybe one day there will be none left ?!
so it becomes the concrete? surely then whenever we lay concrete we are using up water which can never be replaced.. and surely then if we keep laying concrete then maybe one day there will be none left ?!
so it becomes the concrete? surely then whenever we lay concrete we are using up water which can never be replaced.. and surely then if we keep laying concrete then maybe one day there will be none left ?!
so it becomes the concrete? surely then whenever we lay concrete we are using up water which can never be replaced.. and surely then if we keep laying concrete then maybe one day there will be none left ?!
Fun concrete fact: the Hoover Dam, built in 1931, still hasn't fully dried yet (or 'cured' might be a better term).
Won't someone please think of the children!!
so it becomes the concrete? surely then whenever we lay concrete we are using up water which can never be replaced.. and surely then if we keep laying concrete then maybe one day there will be none left ?!
From what I can gather the answer to that question would be 1.25118 × 10*23 tonnes of concrete
* being to the power of
so it becomes the concrete? surely then whenever we lay concrete we are using up water which can never be replaced.. and surely then if we keep laying concrete then maybe one day there will be none left ?!