NEW 911 (991) tested by C&D!!

OcUK Staff
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
39,416
Location
OcUK HQ
Hi there


Well Porsche followers amongst us here will either have already seen this and if not will certainly enjoy reading C&D's preview/test of the new 991:-

FEATURE: THE DESERT FOX

THE DESERT FOX

Porsche's new 911 is in final development in South Africa. We tag along for a ride.
by Juergen Zoellter

Beyond the lift-throttle oversteer, beyond the repair bills, and beyond the accusations of sexual inadequacy, most Porschephiles' longest-standing fear is that Zuffenhausen is going to screw up the 911. This is especially true when they know there are big changes coming. Well, this new 911, code-named 991 and set to debut in September, is larger and built to accommodate a hybrid powertrain. How's that for terrifying? Kinda makes watercooled engines seem like small- er cup holders, no? But if our first experience with the preproduction car is any indication, there's nothing to fear.

We have flown to South Africa to join August Achleitner, the man known as "Mr. 911," responsible for all 911-series cars, and 991 project leader Bernd Kahnan for the car's final chassis-tune shakedown. First question to Achleitner: "How will you keep the soul of the 911 intact?" He smiles and urges calm. "We sharpened the 911 by making it faster, more responsive, safer, and more environmentally friendly. But we didn't mess it up!"

That's certainly true of the bodywork, which is stretched and pulled but still unmistakably 911, even under the camouflage. The car's body is 2.2 inches longer than the outgoing 997 and sits on a 4.0-inch-longer wheelbase. This is to make real estate available for the coming-for-2016 hybrid version's electric motor and components. The front and rear overhangs are shorter, by 1.3 and 0.5 inch respectively, and the car's roofline is lower by 0.5 inch. Because our particular 911 S is outfitted with the sport suspension, it crouches an additional 0.7 inch closer to the pavement.

Dimensional changes to the greenhouse may seem equally small on paper, but they have the effect of making the whole car look sleeker. The windshield is more convex and its rake faster in the interest of aerodynamics -- the new 911's Cd is a claimed 0.29, identical to the 997's. Porsche moved the base of the A-pillars forward by 1.4 inches. And the center bottom of the glass punches out by a meaningful 3.2 inches so that, in combination with a full-length sunroof and more shoulder room, the cabin feels much airier than before. But the back seat is still only useful for the tiniest of children and dogs. Standing on 19- (regular 911) and 20-inch (911 S, optional for 911) wheels, the 991 looks ready to pounce.

Sliding into the car's seat is as easy as ever. The shells are made of aluminum and covered with flat, leather-wrapped pads, offering the comfort and lateral support we've come to expect from a 911. The major differences inside are the Panamera-like door trim, gauges, and sweeping center console, which sacrifices the 911's mechanical parking brake to the electronic gods. But thanks to the higher position of the shorter gear lever, the distance your right hand has to move from the steering wheel to the gearshifter is lessened. Small compensation for all the shared parts and the loss of the auxiliary steering control between the seats.

Crank the key with your left hand, and the engine wakes up with a low-frequency belch and a high-frequency whine. Sort of like a mother-in-law. The Carrera S is powered by the 3.8-liter flat-six with direct injection. It makes 400 horsepower at 7200 rpm, and the rev limiter doesn't kick in until 7600 rpm. The power is chopped up by either a seven-speed manual gearbox (yes, that's seven speeds) or the seven-speed PDK dual-clutch automatic, both made by ZF.

The base 911 loses the 3.6-liter; it now shares the 3.4-liter, direct-injected flat-six with the Boxster S. In the 911, it makes 350 horsepower at 6400 rpm and max torque of 280 pound-feet between 4400 and 6000 rpm. Like the Carrera S, it also offers the choice of ZF's manual or dual-clutch automatic seven-speed.

Porsche gave us a provisional 0-to-60 time of 4.5 seconds and a top speed of 186 mph. Launch control, a feature that will no longer be exclusive to PDK-equipped versions of the 911, should shave considerable time from that conservative sprint figure (we launched the previous Carrera S manual to 60 in 3.9 seconds).

Why are we so sure this bigger car will be quicker? Because it's lighter. Its curb weight is some 55 pounds lower than the 997's due to more extensive use of high-strength steel. And the hybrid version, with its aluminum chassis components and roughly 80-percent high-strength steel, will shave off an additional 22 pounds.

But, as noted, the hybrid Carrera S is four years away; it is due to arrive with the car's midcycle refresh. Even without dual-source power, though, the 2012 911 posts significantly better consumption figures than those of the outgoing car: On the European combined cycle, the 991 quaffs between 12 and 15 percent less fuel, depending on the engine and transmission configuration.

Achleitner hops behind the wheel and heads into the Hawequa Mountains on narrow R101 North out of Paarl. He changes throttle position more than is strictly necessary in order to demonstrate the flat-six's responsiveness. It sounds great -- roaring and burbling under increasing load, snarling menacingly after the engine comes on the cam at 3600 rpm. Above 6000 rpm, the sound coming from behind us is like that of a chain saw tearing down an oak. But we were long gone before we could check for sawdust.

As with the classic, raunchy engine note, steering sensitivity is one of the things that makes a 911 a 911. The development crew was intent on preserving its feel with the new electric-assisted system. "And yet," Achleitner tells us, "it does not transmit as much impact from bad surfaces as before." As we watch his hands work the wheel, we witness no corrections, not even slight ones, at high speed on rough surfaces -- a fairly large change from the more nervous 997.

Achleitner also demonstrates the car's reduced tendency to understeer at tight corner entries. The car reacts more neutrally and does not jiggle over expansion joints anymore due to the fitting of softer anti-roll bars and a 2.1-inch-wider track (60.6 inches) up front. Additionally, the new torque-vectoring differential helps to stabilize the car's back end during load changes in corners. The limited slip provides up to 28-percent lock under throttle and opens completely when you lift.

There was plenty of adjustment work needed in implementing new parts, as Achleitner explains: "For example, carrying over the dynamic engine mounts from the GT3 and the 911 Turbo is relatively simple. But to adjust them to work properly took us thousands of kilometers to dial in." It seems to have been worth the trouble. From the passenger seat, the 991 comes across as the most stable 911 ever built, with minimal loss of directional stability during braking and less front-end washout at the limit.

Of course, this new 911 comes with separate buttons for damper adjustment and dynamic driving modes, as well as the special "journalist button" to fully deactivate stability control, or as Porsche calls it, PSM (Porsche Stability Management). The system stays idle as long as the driver doesn't touch the brake pedal, at which point PSM kicks in again.

But what about the Nürburgring times, Achleitner? No Porsche story is complete without those! The regular 991 does it in 8 minutes 4 seconds, the 991 S in 7:50. "With the best setup, we did 7:37," he says. For some reason, he doesn't want to tell us what his best setup looks like. Maybe it's with the optional carbon-ceramic brakes. Or maybe it's all the little things adding up, as always.



Some highlights:-
* Carrera S to have 400 HP
* Carrera to have 350 HP, share 3.4l engine w/ Boxster S
* 2 trannys: 7-spd manual and 7-spd PDK
* Launch Control available on both transmissions
* 2.5 in longer, 4 in longer wheelbase
* longer wheel base to accommodate HYBRID drivetrain in 2016 mid-cycle refresh
* 12-15% improved fuel efficiency (euro cycle)
* electronic parking brake
* full-length sunroof
* 19-in wheels standard on Carrera, 20-in on Carrera S (20s optional on Carrera)



Some of the stuff seems great, like the fact the new models will be approx 50kg lighter than the outgoing 997 models and the power hikes along with launch control on all models. Plus the Carrera S lapping the ring in 7:37 is rather quick indeed for a 400BHP N/A car with a few more of the sportier options checked, I'd take a guess at ceramics, aerokit and maybe a possible powerpack?

However the car seems to be getting larger, surely the appeal of the 997 is its compact size, the fact you can take it down some of the tightest lanes and attack them, plus the interior looks a bit like a Panamara/Cayenne which is very nice but can see some purist/sportier drivers not hearing all that kit.

It shall be interesting to see what Porsche do to create a GT3 model using this new base with that fancy interior and larger size, seems the 997 is very well suited to the more track focused car.

However I can see a TURBO model based on this 991 car been truly epic and where its real appeal shall be, I can imagine the new 991 to have 50-80 more BHP and weigh less than outgoing model, which would be one hell of a truly epic fast car.


Some pictures:-

Porsche+911+Interior+Spy-thumb-717x477.jpg
 
I can't really take the non turbo, non GT porsche 911 variants seriously any more after being in a series 2 PDK turbo. They just seem a little low on power compared to equal sports coupe's of the same price range or market. Mind you, 400 horse power in the S variant sounds about right these days - the base model sounds rubbish though. 3.4 litre?!

I really hope they improve the interiors this generation though - The 996 interior (which was in part borrowed from the 993) which the current generation shares is almost embarrasing.
 
The interiors are the one thing putting me off Porsche. That and a normal key to start the car (in this market), WTF? Even the GFs Suzuki Swift has comfort access and keyless go!
 
The 997 is a big step up interior wise from the 996, if they do the same again it will step into very very nice interior.

Does that say 7 speed manual though?
 
Big step up? I was in my mates 120 grand 997 turbo and i almost felt sorry for him, that my current car at 1/3rd of the cost had a better looking interior. It was just a 'luxe' version of the 996 interior.
 
* 12-15% improved fuel efficiency (euro cycle)
this is a lot considering it got around 10 to 15% better with the Gen 2 997.
 
Big step up? I was in my mates 120 grand 997 turbo and i almost felt sorry for him, that my current car at 1/3rd of the cost had a better looking interior. It was just a 'luxe' version of the 996 interior.

Yes it was a huge step up from the 996 which was really bad. Thats not saying the 997 was amazing but still a lot better then the 996. The Gen 2 also have a nicer interior but I do agree that even a Audi S5 has a nicer interior then a 997
 
It's still fundamentally the same design though. Albeit wrapped in a bit of higher grade leather ;)

The 996 interior looks dated for sure, but you can get in a 997 and it's like being re-united with the fat girl with the pretty face from high school that lost a lot of weight, but still has a black mole on the end of her nose, and one eye lower than the other.
 
It's still fundamentally the same design though. Albeit wrapped in a bit of higher grade leather ;)

The 996 interior looks dated for sure, but you can get in a 997 and it's like being re-united with the fat girl with the pretty face from high school that lost a lot of weight, but still has a black mole on the end of her nose, and one eye lower than the other.

Cant say i agree with that i think a 997 interior is a pretty near perfect blend of function and looks.

And now this new version has got the Panamera style interior thats another huge step in the right direction.
 
I suppose its a carry on from the Porsche tradition of not fixing anything that is broken - As we have with the 911. The ultimate statement in product evolution. People will line up in their thousands to buy one no matter what ... 'because it's a 911'.

It will be a welcome change with the Panamera interior. We could do with something slightly different.
 
I can't really take the non turbo, non GT porsche 911 variants seriously any more after being in a series 2 PDK turbo. They just seem a little low on power compared to equal sports coupe's of the same price range or market. Mind you, 400 horse power in the S variant sounds about right these days - the base model sounds rubbish though. 3.4 litre?!

I really hope they improve the interiors this generation though - The 996 interior (which was in part borrowed from the 993) which the current generation shares is almost embarrasing.


The turbo's are monsters, the new Turbo S has been tested to 60mph in as low as 2.5s, or it was 2.7s, either way its mind blowing.

Still all the 997's are all sub 5.0s to 60mph, thats hardly slow and some testers have seen sub 4s on the none GT's and none Turbo cars, that is far from slow.
 
Big step up? I was in my mates 120 grand 997 turbo and i almost felt sorry for him, that my current car at 1/3rd of the cost had a better looking interior. It was just a 'luxe' version of the 996 interior.

Try not to emphasise your friends car and how much it cost, whilst it may not have been intentional it comes across as very uncouth.

Also some of us have to deal with ugly women, and I can assure you the 997 interior is no where near that level of struggle, its not great, but its hardly negative like the 996 brinked on and doesn't in any way impede on the car.
 
I suppose its a carry on from the Porsche tradition of not fixing anything that is broken - As we have with the 911. The ultimate statement in product evolution. People will line up in their thousands to buy one no matter what ... 'because it's a 911'.

It will be a welcome change with the Panamera interior. We could do with something slightly different.

Hang on, people are going to line up to buy that car because its a great car and by the sound of it just got even better. I dont believe people at this end of the market do that so much just buy it because its a 911, theres too many other choices.

Some people might buy a new Mondeo every 3 years because their dad always bought fords and so did uncle Jack and now its been passed down to little Johnny and lets have it right if all you want is transport stick to what you know.

By and large people spending 100k on cars aint in my experience stupid by nature, they buy the car that does the best job for what they want, not just because it says Porsche on the back.
 
Last edited:
Try not to emphasise your friends car and how much it cost, whilst it may not have been intentional it comes across as very uncouth.

Also some of us have to deal with ugly women, and I can assure you the 997 interior is no where near that level of struggle, its not great, but its hardly negative like the 996 brinked on and doesn't in any way impede on the car.

Oh don't get me wrong, i wasnt bragging about the cost of his car - I was just shocked to see that his VERY expensive motor had an interior that reminded me of the 996 i bought for a fraction of the price. It also looked a little cheap as well.

I'll forgive that for a moment, since it was by far the most utterly insanely quick car i have EVER been in, in all my life. Astounding. If i had the money i would get one - no questions asked.

But, as a former porsche owner, for all my love of them (and i will go back, eventually) i can see what people say when they criticise a lot of the re-use of the engineering and styling across what seems like decades. The previous generation 997 was not much more than a styling improvement over the 996 - Probably the car the 996 should have been all along, and not the front end stolen from a boxster.
 
Hang on, people are going to line up to buy that car because its a great car and by the sound of it just got even better. I dont believe people at this end of the market do that so much just buy it because its a 911, theres too many other choices.

Some people might buy a new Mondeo every 3 years because their dad always bought fords and so did uncle Jack and now its been passed down to little Johnny and lets have it right if all you want is transport stick to what you know.

By and large people spending 100k on cars aint in my experience stupid by nature, they buy the car that does the best job for what they want, not just because it says Porsche on the back.

Porsche also know the profile of the average customer, who wants 'A 911' and not an exactly lairy one at that. Which is why you have to go turbo or GTx before you get anything that dares to go beyond the established expectations of the marque.

..... which might be why a stock C2/C4 sounds more like a Dyson spinning up, until you let it sound like it should have done all along, and indeed DID with the 993 and below.
 
Porsche also know the profile of the average customer, who wants 'A 911' and not an exactly lairy one at that. Which is why you have to go turbo or GTx before you get anything that dares to go beyond the established expectations of the marque.

..... which might be why a stock C2/C4 sounds more like a Dyson spinning up, until you let it sound like it should have done all along, and indeed DID with the 993 and below.

I think we just have different views on those cars, me i cant for the life of me see how 180 mph and under 5 seconds to 60 in a package more usable every day than anything else with that performance is anything other than a bloody masterpiece of car making weather its a "basic" C2 or not.
 
Oh don't get me wrong, i wasnt bragging about the cost of his car - I was just shocked to see that his VERY expensive motor had an interior that reminded me of the 996 i bought for a fraction of the price. It also looked a little cheap as well.

I'll forgive that for a moment, since it was by far the most utterly insanely quick car i have EVER been in, in all my life. Astounding. If i had the money i would get one - no questions asked.

But, as a former porsche owner, for all my love of them (and i will go back, eventually) i can see what people say when they criticise a lot of the re-use of the engineering and styling across what seems like decades. The previous generation 997 was not much more than a styling improvement over the 996 - Probably the car the 996 should have been all along, and not the front end stolen from a boxster.

I guess that's part of Porsche's identity and appeal now, that their styling doesn't change much - just suitable evolution over time. People will always have a pop at it (sometimes with justification), but you can't really argue with their popularity or the numbers they sell.....
 
Last edited:
Getting bigger isn't so ominous if it's also getting lighter. We're only talking a couple of inches in length so hardly going to affect the sort of roads you can hack down. 4" in wheelbase though - that's quite a bit - bound to be noticable handling wise. I'd be surprised if it's anything other than awesome though.
 
Back
Top Bottom