I've seen people just undertake them instead of moving over and back again.
I always go over and then back.
Yeah, undertaking - particularly at speed can be very dangerous. For the amount of effort required, you might as well just overtake them.
I've seen people just undertake them instead of moving over and back again.
I always go over and then back.
I disagree, it depends on the circumstances.
I find a quite common scenario on a motorway is I'm in lane 1 making good progress and there is a steady stream of traffic in lane 2 and an empty/sparse lane 3, I'm quickly approaching a lorry doing 56,
By then you will have lost it, you should know exactly how far and how fast the traffic is moving around you at all times. Checking mirrors every few seconds helps
If you see a lorry in lane 1 you should be planning to overtake as soon as you see it, you know it will be doing <60mph. You should see it on a clear day or night at least 1/2 mile 800 metres ahead and be checking for gaps then. This will give you 20/30 seconds to plan your move. Then MSM when clear to do so.
Yer see - you've gone and lost yourself a lot of marks by using the term "fast lane" - there is no such thing.
Mirror
You check your mirrors to check is it safe to perform your planned manouvre.
Signal
You signal the direction you're going to be moving, to ensure other drivers are aware of your imminent movement.
Manouvre
After checking again that you can maneuvre safely, carry it out.
Quite simple really I think. Indicators aren't a "Anyone going to let me out?" device.
MIRROR, signal, manoeuvre
***** aren't using their mirrors anymore.
I disagree, it depends on the circumstances.
I find a quite common scenario on a motorway is I'm in lane 1 making good progress and there is a steady stream of traffic in lane 2 and an empty/sparse lane 3, I'm quickly approaching a lorry doing 56, I indicate my desire to move to lane 2 and wait, cars in lane 2 see my indicating and move to lane 3 allowing me into lane 2 without changing my speed, after the overtake I move back in to lane 1 and those who moved to lane 3 return to lane 2 everyone is happy no one has touched a brake pedal.
If I were to consider your school of thought I would have to slow to 56mph behind the lorry and wait for a gap then indicate, manoeuvre and speed up to fall in to line with lane 2 traffic. All the while lane 3 goes unused..... seems a less desirable process to me?
The second scenario would ultimately lead to me refusing to use the first lane when there is a reasonable amount of traffic in lane 2 for fear of having to constantly slow for lorries which would make the whole middle lane cruiser situation even worse.
Wow! Dodgy driver alert. "If they see me, great, if not, oh well".
:\
You simply start indicating and wait for people to move over to let you in - why do you assume that you can't do this?
Wow! Dodgy driver alert. "If they see me, great, if not, oh well".
:\
Not if I came up behind, if a gentle flash didn't move the **** she'd get 400w of main+high beams until she got in the proper lane.
Proper pet hate.