Milly Dowler's voicemail was hacked by News of the Screws

I honestly couldn't care about people with the means to go to Eton, or any other prestigious educational establishment all more power to them for want of a better pun.

The problem inherrent is cronyism, but I suppose I'm just jelous I'm not a crony, yeah? I'm not saying it is unique either on the right, but I am pointing it out.
All you are trying to do is elicit prejudices and emotions similar to your own. It's pathetic.
 
Last edited:
Because all it's doing is trying to evoke emotions by using class war terms. Are they actually Etonian friends? I'm not sure they are. So why use that terminology?

Edit: if they are friends from Eton then of course that would fine I would add!

Why do people use emotive terminology on the right towards the left?

It wasn't a direct emotive plea, just pointing out the obvious. Cameron and co are more intertangled with these businesses than the opposition.

If thats emotive, fine. We have emotive politics then.
 
It wasn't a direct emotive plea, just pointing out the obvious. Cameron and co are more intertangled with these businesses than the opposition.
You said 'Etonian friends', not just 'these businesses'.

You're still yet to tell us which 'Etonian friends', specifically, he ought to go after. I can't think of anyone under and including the Murdoch clan who went to Eton.
 
All you are trying to do is illicit prejudices and emotions similar to your own. It's pathetic.

Crawl back under that rock you bitter little racist man.

I frankly don't care for the opinion of someone so narrow minded and xenophobic trying to call me prejudiced. It is massively hypocritical, but that has never stopped you before so...
 
Why do people use emotive terminology on the right towards the left?

It wasn't a direct emotive plea, just pointing out the obvious. Cameron and co are more intertangled with these businesses than the opposition.

If thats emotive, fine. We have emotive politics then.

Emotive terminology just detracts from your point. They're his friends, fine, you'd be right there are issues with that,

Instead you had to make it sound like some old Etonian boys club, the upper class against us, and now your point has been lost. Look at the replies you've had. How much has actually been concerned with your point and how much because you were trying to evoke class tension?
 
You said 'Etonian friends', not just 'these businesses'.

You're still yet to tell us which 'Etonian friends', specifically, he ought to go after. I can't think of anyone under and including the Murdoch clan who went to Eton.

I never said he ought to go directly after any particular person, his Etonian friends are synonomous for these businesses supporters and benefactors up here anyway.

If you take great offence to it then fine, but that comment was not made in direct correlation to an individual. Lazy political talk perhaps, but who cares?
 
Emotive terminology just detracts from your point. They're his friends, fine, you'd be right there are issues with that,

Instead you had to make it sound like some old Etonian boys club, the upper class against us, and now your point has been lost. Look at the replies you've had. How much has actually been concerned with your point and how much because you were trying to evoke class tension?

The replies say more about the demographic of OcUK than anything else.

People have taken it the wrong way due to my poor explanation, it was meant to correlate business not invoke "class war".

I think that's happened already, a random on the internet is unlikely to start that ;) :p
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14069924

Much better than his last video interview, hits it on the head really, those responsible should be brought to justice, but the fact she is still in her job and according to news asked to leave the building after giving the news shows you how the journalists feel towards her as its them who will suffer, not the Editor and involved journalists.

One less rag is wonderful news but to ditch it is a cheap and nasty way of trying to get out of the embarrassment. When its down to a certain few who've caused this...

Time will tell to be honest, she has to be the most hated person in britain as of today, all this relates to her, the public when hearing all this hear her name, and she is still employed AND is running their so called internal investigation is LOLworthy.
 
[TW]Fox;19536116 said:
Why this and not 'His English friends'? It's just as accurate, infact probably more so.

James Murdoch doesn't appear to have attended Eton. Neither did Rebekah Wade. Infact just who are these Etonian friends in this case?

Because if I use the word English I got moronic Englishman calling me Anti-English?

What does it matter? I think the reaction of everyone running around going "JELIOUS, YOU HAVE-NOT, CLASS BIGOT" etc are taking it a little bit to heart?

Again, this isn't exclusive to the Notw or accusations of cronyism. It may be lazy as a descriptive correlation, but it is nothing new either.

Storm in a tea cup comes to mind, and I have to wonder why.
 
Back
Top Bottom