Used DSLR

Soldato
Joined
22 Apr 2009
Posts
3,772
Location
North-West
Hi guys,

Im looking into buying a used DSLR to see if i can get more into photography.

Im only after a cheap entry level camera with a standard lens to start off with (i can buy new lens in the future)

What should i look out for?

What advise can you give regarding the shutter count?

Thanks in advance!
 
I got a D50 for around £60 a while back, i don't know the shutter count, even if it went wrong tomorrow I would have got my monies worth...

I'd keep an eye out for a d40/d50/d70 :)
 
I picked up a good deal a few months back. I pounced as soon as it popped up on the bay. Here's what I got:

- Nikon D70 boxed with everything
- 18-70mm f3.5-4.5 with hood, pouch etc
- Hoya 67mm circular polariser
- Cokin P holder with 67mm adaptor
- Two Cokin ND grads plus one plain ND
- One each of 1gb and 2 gb CF cards

All for £190 in almost mint condition with low use. There are some very good deals to be had, so keep looking. :)

If going Nikon, try your best to get the 18-70mm. It's much nicer to use than the 18-55mm.
 
Yeah couple of hundred should get you set up on a d50/d70/d40 or the equiv canons. Nothing wrong with them. D50 is a cheap motor body and quite small.
 
Can anyone suggest a bridge camera that may give the same results as a DSLR without the swapping of lens?

One does not exist I'm afraid.

The cheapest new D-SLR will give siginificantly better quality results than any of the high bridge cameras.

I'd probably bank on a 5-6 year old D-SLR having better image quality than a modern bridge.

I'm not against them however, my first 'proper' camera was a bridge and I took some great shots on it.

But don't be tempted by the lure of a 35x optical zoom lens, I found a lot of them to be slow and unusable at times.

What sort of things do you plan on shooting & is size / weight important?
 
You're correct ManCuBus!

If I were the OP and seriously felt I didn't want to change lenses then something like an 18-200mm lens should reliably cover the vast majority of situations.

I'd certainly rather do that than get/use a prosumer again. Focus speed alone is what tips the balance for me!

Of course eventually I'm sure the changing of lenses won't be an issue but I do understand your concerns Vanquish-Storm - I worried about the same thing when I first decided to get a DSLR! :)

gt
 
Is there much differance between a DSLR and a Film SLR? (by film i think i mean 35mm?!)

Can, worms.

There's a massive difference in usage and both have big advantages over the other in places. Digital lets you shoot hundreds of frames a day for no cost. Film can get you quality that digital can't match until you spend £4k+

Digital sensors have different characteristics to film too which you need to learn whichever way you go. That aside, obviously the principles are the same.

It's not a substitute for digital, make no mistake. That's probably the bottom line here, I shoot a lot of film (35mm and 120) but it's absolutely not a substitute for having a DSLR as well.

It's difficult to call it cheap either, assuming you want AF and a zoom lens, a F100 and 24-50 zoom will set you back about £300 and then you're paying about £12 a roll for film and processing (nearer £25 if you'd like it scanned for you).

Much as I love film it's not because it's fabulous value.
 
Just been told its the Fuji S5700 not the S2000HD is this still worth it? Good bridge camera to see me through till later in the year?

Should be ok but its certainly not as much of a bargain any more.

Thats a 4 year old camera that was only £130 new in 2007 but it will certainly take pics, whether they are any good or not........well thats up to the the thing thats holding it. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom