Are you Homophobic?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nature is about life and the continuation of life is it not, we've evolved into what we are because of it. You are saying it's a "natural" behaviour which is a completely different sense to the word. Nature has no bearing on our behaviour? So i still think it goes against nature. Don't get me wrong i don't want to ban gay people or outlaw it, it's just in "my opinion" to be wrong according to nature.

Nature is not about the continuation of life, it's about balance. Population gets too large, population is reduced.

Ever thought that this is nature's way of controlling a population which it deems is expanding too rapidly?
 
Just imagine a world where every guy was gay. You may as well stick all the women in pods and farm them. I doubt they'd be up for it tbh. You'd get some children born, but not enough to sustain the world.

Given that the number of gay men is growing, is this not a slippery slope to the end of the world? We can nip it in the bud now.
No considering the biggest threat to the world is human population, this could be nature attempting and failing to compensate.
 
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.

i think someones getting upset :D
 
Nature is so complicated, that a simple no children - no survival argument does not work. It could be that gays are put in the system so they help with the survival of their brothers and sisters families as extra resource gathers. This would support theory as that your chance of being gay increases with the more older siblings you have. You don't know, the solution space is so large its hard to know what the optimum solution for survival is.

A man's penis goes into a woman's vagina, that's what they both were made for. lol :p I might try eating this jaffa cake through my ear :D

No considering the biggest threat to the world is human population, this could be nature attempting and failing to compensate.

Any facts or figures with that or an wild assumption?
 
Last edited:
Just imagine a world where every guy was gay. You may as well stick all the women in pods and farm them. I doubt they'd be up for it tbh. You'd get some children born, but not enough to sustain the world.


In this highly unlikely event I am sure people would be able to forego their personal preferences for the continuation of the human race. Taking one for the team, as it were...

Given that the number of gay men is growing, is this not a slippery slope to the end of the world? We can nip it in the bud now.

They number of people is growing, full stop. Over population is likely to be the biggest threat to humanity, not gay people.
 
do you even understand why you're using the word, troll ? i guess not..

stop trying to push your gay ways onto people.. i can live with people being gay, trying to get me to say, being gay is normal isnt going to happen, you're like a gay foot in the door preacher..

ive been around lots of gay people, but i keep to my self.. in the world of the gay, nothing is abnormal, this argument cant be won

I'm confident that there are hundreds of ways in which you are not normal.

Normal is simply anything that applies to more than half of a population.

So being left handed isn't normal. Living outside of a city isn't normal in this country. Watching the latest Harry Potter film isn't normal. Being a Christian isn't normal. Being as beautiful as I am isn't normal. Being an HGV driver isn't normal. Being tall isn't normal. Being short isn't normal. Being able to type quickly and accurately isn't normal. Wearing a green shirt isn't normal.

It's possible that one of those examples isn't entirely true :)

Normality is only relevant in statistics. For everything else, the relevant question is whether or not something is harmful, not whether or not it's normal.
 
Nature is not about the continuation of life, it's about balance. Population gets too large, population is reduced.

Ever thought that this is nature's way of controlling a population which it deems is expanding too rapidly?

No a thousand times no.

"nature" is not concious, it does not decide there is "too much " life so it'll make some people gay".



population gets too large outstrips it's food supply and so less survive the next year to breed sure but not "there's a lot of chickens time to make them gay to thin the numbers out".
 
I'm confident that there are hundreds of ways in which you are not normal.

Normal is simply anything that applies to more than half of a population.

So being left handed isn't normal. Living outside of a city isn't normal in this country. Watching the latest Harry Potter film isn't normal. Being a Christian isn't normal. Being as beautiful as I am isn't normal. Being an HGV driver isn't normal. Being tall isn't normal. Being short isn't normal. Being able to type quickly and accurately isn't normal. Wearing a green shirt isn't normal.

It's possible that one of those examples isn't entirely true :)

Normality is only relevant in statistics. For everything else, the relevant question is whether or not something is harmful, not whether or not it's normal.

ok, being gay isnt harmful to two people who want to be gay with each other, it would be harmful if the gay was trying to come onto me
 
I don't mind them if;

A) They don't start snogging in front of me, but that also counts for hetrosexuals so it's not really homo-specific.
B) They don't come on to me (Yes, that counts in both ways it can be twisted ;)).
C) They don't act over girly like 99.9% of girls don't act and don't talk in that stereotypical 'gay guy' voice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom