Organic v. Monsanto (Megacorperation Selling GM crops/seeds)

Soldato
Joined
25 Jul 2010
Posts
5,342
Location
A house
More than 270,000 organic farmers are taking on corporate agriculture giant Monsanto in a lawsuit filed March 30. Led by the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, the family farmers are fighting for the right to keep a portion of the world food supply organic—and preemptively protecting themselves from accusations of stealing genetically modified seeds that drift on to their pristine crop fields.

Consumers are powerful. For more than a decade, a cultural shift has seen shoppers renounce the faster-fatter-bigger-cheaper mindset of factory farms, exposéd in the 2008 documentary Food, Inc. From heirloom tomatoes to heritage chickens, we want our food slow, sustainable, and local—healthy for the earth, healthy for animals, and healthy for our bodies.

But with patented seeds infiltrating the environment so fully, organic itself is at risk. Monsanto’s widely used Genuity® Roundup Ready® canola seed has already turned heirloom canola oil into an extinct species. The suing farmers are seeking to prevent similar contamination of organic corn, soybeans, and a host of other crops. What’s more, they’re seeking to prevent Monsanto from accusing them of unlawfully using the very seeds they’re trying to avoid.

“It seems quite perverse that an organic farmer contaminated by transgenic seed could be accused of patent infringement,” says Public Patent Foundation director Dan Ravicher in a Cornucopia Institutearticle about the farmers’ lawsuit (May 30, 2011), “but Monsanto has made such accusations before and is notorious for having sued hundreds of farmers for patent infringement.”

Even as the megacorporation enjoys soaring stock, the U.S. justice department continues to look into allegations of its fraudulent antitrust practices (The Street, June 29, 2011):

Monsanto, which has acquired more than 20 of the nation’s biggest seed producers and sellers over the last decade, has long pursued a strict policy with its customers, obligating them to buy its bioengineered seeds every year rather than use them in multiple planting seasons. Farmers who disobey are blacklisted forever.

It’s a wide net Monsanto has cast over the agricultural landscape. As Ravicher points out, “it’s actually in Monsanto’s financial interest to eliminate organic seed so that they can have a total monopoly over our food supply.” Imagine a world devoid of naturally vigorous traditional crops and controlled by a single business with a appetite for intellectual property. Did anyone else feel a cold wind pass through them? Now imagine a world where thousands of family farmers fight the good fight to continue giving consumers a choice in their food—and win.

http://www.utne.com/Environment/Agriculture-Organic-Farmers-Lawsuit-Monsanto.aspx

I hope to god these guys win, because in the end, the last thing we want is a world full of genetic modified crops.

So Monsanto can sue you if the seeds from there genetic crops drift into your field? Damn, you just can't make this **** up!

And your damn right, i want my fruit and vegetables to grow up like they have for thousands of years and not this pumped up crap.

If Monsanto was able to ban all organic seeds, it would be devastating. Organic milk tastes 1000 time better then normal milk. As a simple example.
 
sorry, but i've not noticed any organic food tasting better than non organic food, that includes milk.

I agree that farmers should have a choice what happens on their lands, and should not face issues due to floating seeds.

I however, don't see the huge fuss regarding gm crops.
 
They run the seeds like software in fact they send enforcement teams to sniff around farms and see if the farmer is breaking the license using seed separators to "pirate" the seeds from the crop. it's like the BSA. You have to buy new seeds every time.
 
I strongly dislike Monsanto. I have ever since I found out that they mix their GM soya 50:50 with non-GM soya. If it's perfectly safe and that beneficial and good, surely it's good enough to be sold non-disguised no?

Organic farms losing their organic status from cross-pollination and 'contamination' from GM crops is a very serious matter. I hope the farmers win.
 
sorry, but i've not noticed any organic food tasting better than non organic food, that includes milk.

I agree that farmers should have a choice what happens on their lands, and should not face issues due to floating seeds.

I however, don't see the huge fuss regarding gm crops.

Organic is way of growing, this seems to go much further and is wiping out old breeds.
I don't really care about organic or how strict tescos veg selection is. As they still use crap breeds which are grown for shelf life, size, crop size and not for flavour.
Bring back the traditional varieties.
 
Oh god, I'm already dreading reading this thread tomorrow.

Monsanto have horrific practices when it comes to GM, very careless and unethical. Regardless, GM crops by themselves are not a bad thing, they are only bad when they have been engineered recklessly.

Plus bulk grown organic food is marketed as being healthier or better for the environment, when in reality it really, really, really isn't.

I would expand but I'm feeling particularly lazy this evening, forgive me.
 
I however, don't see the huge fuss regarding gm crops.

It's not just the genetic modification of crops to increase yield, make them more pesticide resistant via adding 'foreign' genes thats the worrying thing, it's also that they're modifying the crops to make them 'barren'.

Basically they're modifying a lot of crops so that they either don't produce seeds or the harvestable amount of seed is drastically reduced. As kwerk implies, this is good for companies like Monsanto as it means the farmers can no longer harvest seeds for replanting next year but have to come back to them to buy more. This is stage one. Stage two is once the GM crops have taken a large proportion of market share, when the seed producers can start controlling the prices...

/tinfoil hat
 
Basically they're modifying a lot of crops so that they either don't produce seeds or the harvestable amount of seed is drastically reduced.

This is one side of a double edged sword. Environmentalists moan that genetically modified material can find its way into the environment (which is fairly lol-worthy in itself, for one, you try growing crops in a field with wild varieties and leave it to fend for itself and see what happens) - such 'terminator' technology is one very effective means of damage control in this regards reducing such occurances to relatively zero. It's arguably a pointless and unnecessary step anyway.
 
Yeah I would much rather they were hundred percent baron. If farms want the increase production, they have to pay for it. Or go free seed and have lower yield.
 
I hope to god these guys win, because in the end, the last thing we want is a world full of genetic modified crops.

Like farm animals and domestic dogs (and many other animals) which have been bred to be what they are today?

And your damn right, i want my fruit and vegetables to grow up like they have for thousands of years and not this pumped up crap.

If you want that then don't have children, there isn't enough land for everyone to have their food grown like this. If it wasn't for the green revolution the population would be half what it is today, not so sustainable eh?

If Monsanto was able to ban all organic seeds, it would be devastating. Organic milk tastes 1000 time better then normal milk. As a simple example.

I do prefer free range eggs but I don't think organic makes a difference. It's just people running in fear from big business straight into the open arms of superstition, just like with 'alternative medicine'.
 
Back
Top Bottom