ah ok so BF3 will look a lot nicer but will be less playable as DX10 will eat into the FPS
so why is there no DX9 again?
my eyes are starting to hurt as im typing here because of 'something' that this OS does to text, although it appears more sharp/clear than on XP i can't look at it for too long before it 'fuzzes'
This all adds up to just say never buy anything PC related ever again then if you get upset when it goes out of date.
My present system runs Crysis and that looks way better than BF3.
Here's how mine looks on Win7:
![]()
Nice and sharp, I hate the softer ClearType text.
How does it look on yours?
good idea on the pic, never thought to do that
this was taken with XP, on windows 7 my text looks the same as on yours
Here's how mine looks on Win7:
![]()
Nice and sharp, I hate the softer ClearType text.
How does it look on yours?
That looks horrid, I'm guessing you also don't use AA in games because you prefer it nice and sharp too?![]()
Seriously, you're having a conversation regarding ClearType in a thread which is talking about BF3 not being playable on XP. Wow. Just wow.
That looks horrid, I'm guessing you also don't use AA in games because you prefer it nice and sharp too?![]()
Of course I have AA, but AA in games makes the lines nice and sharp, where as the text in QlimaxUK's image is not sharp, it's blurred.
It does, but I'm not sure why since I use Cleartype and I don't think this is blurry at all.
![]()
Rack.
you are using an operating system that is a decade old.
you have no justification for your argument.
I really fail to understand the existence of XP die hards, sure it was ok when vista was about, but 7 has been around for 2 years now including RTM release. its established and it works.
fact is, Vista/7 is a prerequisite to play BF3. if you want to play BF3 then you will need a new OS.