Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

cashing in on under 18s buying the game basicly,plus on that video above ,soon as he said quick scoping is deffinitly coming back,that guy should have just slapped him
 
I must admit, from watching that video I am intrigued about how killstreaks will work.

I am thinking it is going to be a big departure from the traditional way.
 
Neither do I. It's almost as if they love the fact all the kids uplaod thousands of QS vidoes to youtube.

When he was asked that question he did mention about weapon balancing so not sure if that will effect QS maybe they could have QS but make it so its less accurate when you do it and you dont get one shot kills all the time and i am sure it would put a lot of people off doing it so much if it didnt work as well as in mw2 .
 
He was quite clear about saying how QS is the same as it was in MW2, I think this will be one area they will not 'nerf' and leave it alone so the OpTic crew and all their little pre-pubescent fans can carry on posting videos to Youtube about how elite they are after the 100th time of trying they finally manage the 720 quick scope off the top of a building.

They obviously know there is a target audience for this stuff and are fully embracing that community of players.

It doesn't make that much difference to me if I am honest, I do not think these QS are elite players, yes it's annoying getting killed by them, but it's even funnier when you can smash them into the ground time after time.
 
Interested to see what he means regarding killstreaks and them going back to a COD4 type support rather than constantly something in the air. They obviously know the stats themselves on how many kills where made with guns and how many where made with support.

Shame about the QSing.
 
Well I usually average 30 kills per game in TDM and my kills are usually 50/50 from guns and killstreaks, but even if I don't use killstreaks I would still get the same amount of kills, but it would just take longer thats all.

I've got to say that I'm on the fence about killstreaks because I do need them to win games in TDM due to the fact that I always (and I mean always!) get the biggest retards in existence on my team who manage to get 3 kills and 40 deaths between them, so without those killstreaks I'm not able to pick up the slack from 3 idiots. I mean I can go 30 kills with 3 deaths and we still lose because some massive retard cannot stop dying and instead of leaving when he dies say 10 times in a row, instead he stays in giving them killstreaks and not bothering to shoot them down :rolleyes: This happens in just about every single game I play and it's always me and Bevy or me and Jake finishing top of the team with 90% of the kills between us and we still barely win.

So unless they can manage to match the teams up fairly in MW3 (it's basically MW2.5 so it's highly unlikely), I'm going to find it difficult to play this when there is less then half a team like it is now with MW2.
 
Last edited:
I've got to say that I'm on the fence about killstreaks because I do need them to win games in TDM due to the fact that I always (and I mean always!) get the biggest retards in existence on my team
.

I use to play with you a fair bit.... Oh wait a minute :0 :)
 
I've got to say that I'm on the fence about killstreaks because I do need them to win games in TDM due to the fact that I always (and I mean always!) get the biggest retards in existence on my team who manage to get 3 kills and 40 deaths between them, so without those killstreaks I'm not able to pick up the slack from 3 idiots.

:D
 
I use to play with you a fair bit.... Oh wait a minute :0 :)

Difference being when you have a bad game you tend to get just as many kills as you do deaths, normally I put up with 1 kill 18 deaths every night now.

Alrik I'm sure that on day of release It won't be hard to make a team of 6. I'm sure ammobox will be around to help you with the numbers :D.

No you'll have the opposite, instead everyone will want to play and then when there is no room they will join session and camp in corners and then they wonder why they don't get an invite when there is room. I would rather play black ops with the other team all going last stand then play with ammobox.



It happend again :p I played 21 games, I Won 16 and lost 5. These are 2 of the worst I had to put up with, some of the games I did win were just as bad as the ones I lost (for people going negative I mean).

http://i.imgur.com/WZiQRh.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/NzLwEh.jpg

I took a picture of the scoreboards just to see if I was exaggerating, but just about every game I played I had some random on my team going masively negative and if it wasn't for the killstreaks I would have lost far more games, since it would have been impossible for me to keep up with the other team when I have 3 dribbling idiots on my team.
 
Last edited:
my win ratio has gone so bad on black ops, its 0.97 shocking when all i play is hcsd with randoms,and my kd is 1.47.I use to have a decent one on mw2 with playing with you lot
 
Search is different though, because no matter how good you are you cannot carry your team if it's like 6 vs 1 (yes it does happen but not that often). And playing search on your own is a nightmare because if come across even an average team of players who play together you will rarely win unless you've got atleast 1 or 2 decent randoms, but the odds of that is like winning the lottery with these games.
 

I just can't wait for this now!

Predator Missile is BACK!

Un manned AC-130 or possibly player 2 was controlling it

edit : nope you have a marker which is then thrown in to the enemy that the AC-130 fires on too.
 
Last edited:
Something we all missed

No more killstreaks hello Pointstreaks

You now get you streaks from points rather than kills (apparently) so them moaning about getting more value from taking them Dom points there is your answer
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom