Objectively shouldn't you have been monitoring your mirrors a little better? I mean you did turn in before determining that it was 100% clear which is dangerous in itself.
Has anyone told you you sound exactly like simon pegg?
Objectively shouldn't you have been monitoring your mirrors a little better? I mean you did turn in before determining that it was 100% clear which is dangerous in itself.
Objectively shouldn't you have been monitoring your mirrors a little better? I mean you did turn in before determining that it was 100% clear which is dangerous in itself.
At that speed I doubt he had been in the mirriors long. I have had bikes do this to me, and you just never see them. The bike should have waited. Riding a bike like that will eventually get him killed.
Heres hoping
Quit your trolling, it's a single lane road so provided he was indicating with plenty of time the onus was on the overtaking vehicle to make sure he is conducting a safe manoeuvre.Objectively shouldn't you have been monitoring your mirrors a little better? I mean you did turn in before determining that it was 100% clear which is dangerous in itself.
Now while he might have seen the Motorcyclist he would not necessarily have realised he was hooning past him at a rate of knots, and I think the following takes precedence anyway:Turning right
179
Well before you turn right you should:
- use your mirrors to make sure you know the position and movement of traffic behind you
167
DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other road users. For example:
- approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road
...
- when a road user is indicating right, even if you believe the signal should have been cancelled. Do not take a risk; wait for the signal to be cancelled